Three waves to keep inflation high over the next decade: A Special Report

Tim Davies

Holon Global Investments

We would like to firstly make it explicitly clear to our readers that we do not in any way support the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine. War is horrible and the wrong action regardless of who is involved. This includes the actions of the US and Australia in its recent involvement in wars throughout the Middle East. Our role as investment analysts is to remain at neutral as possible. This position allows us to correctly assess the contribution of parties directly involved in the lead up to this conflict, as well as assess the long-term consequences that are likely to evolve.

In summary, we are proposing that the Russia/Ukraine conflict looks set to splinter the world into two distinct trading and financial systems that are aligned across a US and a Chinese axis, triggering a long bout of sustained inflation that will impact commodity and food prices over this decade. This inflation is set to come in three waves.

1st Wave – Rising energy prices

The cause of the first layer of inflation starts from an imbalance between the supply and demand of energy in the form of oil and natural gas. The last sustained global inflationary period occurred as a direct result of the 1973 Israeli Yom Kippur War and the 1979 Iranian revolution, which led to a 13-fold oil price increase from US$2.70 in 1973 to US$36 in 1980. Then US Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volker was forced to raise US interest rates to 19% in 1981, which we outlined in last month’s Holon newsletter.

Fast forward to the 21st century, and we see rising demand from the developing world, which is expected to grow its share of global oil demand from 40% in 1990 toward 70% in 2030(1). However, with many of the largest oil fields reaching maturity, and with US-led sanctions on major oil reserve nations like Iran, Venezuela, Iraq and now Russia, the rising oil price volatility witnessed over the past 20 years is likely to worsen.

The consequence of higher sustained energy prices over the past two decade has led to higher prices across the entire supply chain for goods and services. Higher food prices, which depend upon stable oil and gas prices to manufacture fertilizers, plant and harvest crops, fuel logistics networks, refrigerate sales supermarkets and for cooking, impact consumers in the developing world the hardest (Figure 1, below). Food prices have doubled since 2017, likely driving food costs above 50% of income across most developing countries.

Figure 1: Percentage of GDP per capita spent on food, 2017 ($USD)

The recent war in Ukraine has triggered a big jump in food prices. Together, Russia and Ukraine’s share of global exports is 32% for wheat, 19% of corn and 80% of sunflower oil. Russia and Belarus together supply 40% of potash while China and Russia supply over 50% of global phosphate, both critical to the production of fertilizer(2) that is used to lift crop yields in agriculture. Further complicating supply constraints is the recent introduction of food export bans from Argentina (Soybean and meal), Algeria (all food products), Indonesia (palm oil), Ukraine (barley, sugar, wheat), Serbia (grains and oils) and China (Fertilizer).

Lower global food supply risks further increase in grain and livestock prices, with wheat and corn up 50% and 20% respectively since February 1st. Higher energy prices are also expected to raise the cost of logistics and manufacturing globally, raising the cost of almost all goods and services for the consumer.

All this data almost certainly means that inflation is here to stay, which was confirmed by US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen in December 2021 when she stated, “I am ready to retire the word transitory…I can agree that hasn’t been an apt description of what we are dealing with”(3). Best described in layman’s terms, she means “Houston, we have a problem”.

2nd Wave – Repositioning commodity supply chains

The 2nd inflationary force will be driven by the massive costs associated with shifting commodities production away from Russia, as well as other countries who appear to be aligning against the US. This group includes the 39 countries that voted either against or abstained from voting in the recent United Nations efforts to sanction Russia following its actions in the Ukraine. Also included are Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Brazil, who have each made public statements against direct sanctions on Russia.

Figure 2: Political alignment of global oil reserves, March 2022

Figure 2 above should set off massive alarm bells for US aligned nations, including Australia and most of Europe. With 72% of global oil reserves located in countries that are aligned with China and Russia, the ability of Western nations to shift their oil resources towards friendlier nations is severely limited. Over one third of US aligned resources are the Canadian tar sands, which produces three times more global warming pollution than conventional crude oil(4), while another one quarter of these resources are found in Kuwait, which is surrounded by China/Russia aligned partners Iraq, Iran, and Saudi Arabia.

Figure 3: Political alignment of global gas reserves, March 2022

Global natural gas reserves (Figure 3, above) are also heavily aligned with China and Russia supporting countries, which together control 67% of global reserves. Almost 40% of US-aligned gas reserves are in the South Pars field of Qatar, which is split 50/50 with Russia-aligned Iran. Efforts to shift Europe’s natural gas reliance away from Russia towards US shale gas is also unlikely a long-term solution given the US only holds 5% of global gas reserves.

The location of oil and gas reserves in countries aligned with China and Russia will require a massive increase in investment, measure in the trillions of dollars, to identify and develop new commodity resources. Besides exploration and production costs, substantial infrastructure investment will also be required for pipelines, mine site development, roads, ports, and shipping. While the shift to renewable energy sources will alleviate some of these concerns over the next few decades, building them will require substantial fossil fuels to mine the necessary resources and manufacturing.

Massive long-term investment also needs to be undertaken for many other commodities including fertilizer (potash and phosphorous), copper, aluminum as well as food production and water. Unless the Europe and the US can find common ground and alleviate their multi-decade fight with Russia and now China, the cost of developing replacement resources will drive substantially higher resource prices and inflation for consumers over the long term (>10 years). This was made clear in recent comments by the German economic and energy minister Robert Habeck when he stated that a boycott of Russian oil and gas “could cause mass poverty in Germany”(5).

3rd Wave– A new reserve currency is born

The third and largest force that is likely to trigger long-term inflation is the acceleration in the shift away from the US Dollar as the reserve currency of the world towards an alternate China-aligned reserve currency.

This shift away from the US Dollar picked up in 2014, when traditional buyers of US Treasury bonds, led by China and Japan began to reduce their exposure to US government bonds. Foreign holders share of US government debt fell to 26% in 2021, a 16-year low (Figure 4, below).

Figure 4: US Gov’t debt held by foreign holders, quarterly ($USD)

Source: Wolf Street

Efforts by the US Federal Reserve to artificially hold US treasury interest rates below 2%, while accelerating artificial money creation through its 13-year ‘temporary’ Quantitative Easing support program, led to the high inflation and the loss of purchasing power on capital invested in these bonds.

Rather than raise interest rates or lower government spending, the US Federal Reserve Bank instead chose to purchase US debt on its own balance sheet which has grown from US$800 billion in 2008 to almost US$9 trillion in 2022. In addition, removing the requirement for US commercial banks to include their exposure to US treasury bonds when calculating Basel III leverage ratio limits, has allowed the banks to increase their holdings by a US$1.8 trillion since April 2020(6), reaching a record US$4.8 trillion in March 2022.

The massive accumulation of US debt can be traced back to the US Federal Reserve’s decision to maintain a low interest rate policy through Quantitative Easing. China first raised its concerns over the US Dollar in 2009, when then People’s Bank of China governor Zhou Xiaochuan called for a new reserve currency “disconnected from individual nations and able to remain stable in the long-run”(7).

Tensions have risen substantially following recent moves by the US, Japan, and Europe to prevent Russia from accessing more than US$300 billion of its foreign exchange (FX) reserves(8) following its actions in Ukraine. Such a strong move has never been undertaken against a single country before and sets a dangerous precedent that any country unwilling to support the US can have its FX reserves confiscated. For the many regions of the world that have been directly impacted by military action from US-aligned countries across South-East Asia, India, Africa and the Middle East over the past 50 years, the lack of alignment in the consequences of military action looks to be the proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back.

Over US$12 trillion is held in FX reserves by the top 20 reserve holders in the world, with 53% of this value held by counties aligned with China or Russia. These countries, particularly China with US$3 trillion reserves, will almost certainly shift more assets like gold bullion, while Bitcoin may also begin to attract some sovereign interest, given the current commodity supply concerns and high prices through much of the next decade, it’s also likely that these countries will use these reserves to stockpile essential commodity resources like oil, copper, nickel, and possibly rare earth elements.

Last month Russia and China formerly announced its plans to launch an alternate reserve currency(9) backed by a basket of currencies and commodities including gold. Most of the work on this Stable Depository Right (SDR) basket has already been completed, with a first draft of the policy expected within the next two weeks. This SDR basket will initially include the other 4 members of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan. Its success could see it quickly extend further to include the additional 14 members of the Shanghai Co-operative Organization (SCO) that would bring the large and rapidly growing economies of India, Pakistan, Turkey, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia on board.

Finally, it is also reasonable to expect that the 145 countries participating in China’s One-Belt-One-Road (OBOR) will also look to settle their trade in a stable and neutral currency that an SDR would provide, without the threat of confiscation from a single country.

The shift to a multipolar world now looks to be a certainty, with the world splitting along a US vs China axis. Important elements to consider in this discussion is the distribution of populations, global debt, and major commodity resources across each axis.

If we begin with population distribution, we see that countries who aligned with Russia or abstaining in the recent Ukraine vote at the UN, plus those who publicly refused to enact sanctions on Russia (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Mexico, and Brazil), accounted for 60% of the world’s population in 2020. If we add in the SCO nations to the mix, we surpass 70% of the world, while the addition of OBOR takes us closer to 90%.

Next, looking across the location of key commodities, as seen in the table below(10), we see that dominance between each axis rests slightly with the China axis, which has more resources in iron ore, potash, cobalt, platinum group metals (PGM) and rare earths.

Figure 5: Political alignment of global resources, March 2022

1 – Chile 23% global copper reserves 2 – Indonesia 19% nickel 3- Peru 19% gold 4- Chile – 52% Lithium

Worth noting is that while the US currently has dominance across 4 of the 10 key resources listed above, in each case its lead rests on a single country that is also a member of the OBOR trade union. If a China-axis reserve currency was more widely adopted by the OBOR members, we would see all the 10 global resource reserves aligned with the China axis. The fall of the US Dollar as the sole reserve currency will likely lead to an accelerated loss of its purchasing power, especially priced against hard assets like gold, silver and other commodities. Bitcoin should also benefit from the same US dollar devaluation.

Finally, if we next look at global external debt, we see that the Top 20 countries hold a combined liability of US$80 trillion(11). Remarkably, just 4.7% of this external debt value is held by countries aligned with the China axis (China, India, Brazil, and Russia), which makes them at less risk from rising inflation and the eventual need to raise interest rates. With 95% of this debt held by the heavily indebted countries across Europe as well as the US, global investors will eventually demand higher interest rates to compensate for the risk of default, or alternatively shift their assets towards safer investment opportunities.

Conclusion

The world is at an enormous crossroads that needs to be carefully considered by investors to ensure their assets are best positioned to manage what will certainly be a volatile period over the next decade. While the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine is unacceptable, the heavy-handed response from US-aligned central banks has forced the hand of government’s representing almost 60% of the world’s population to accelerate the shift away from the US dollar acting the only reserve currency. Unfortunately, the genie is now out of the bottle and cannot be put back in.

Inflation from the first two forces, rising energy prices and a shift away from the China/Russia commodities axis will likely continue to accelerate over the next decade, impacting energy, commodity, and food prices. The third inflation force has also started, and risks causing the greatest disruption to asset prices if not managed carefully by both governments and individual investors. As mentioned above, hard commodities like gold, silver, energy, and other resources should be primary beneficiaries from the three waves of inflation outlined above. Bitcoin also stands to benefit greatly from the decline in the purchasing power of the US Dollar.

Holon will continue to outline our thoughts on this topic, particularly the evidence supporting the emergence of a new reserve currency and its possible impact on inflation, as more details emerge over the next few months.

Appendix attached

pdf attached
Footnotes.pdf
........
This article has been prepared by Holon Global Asset Management Pty Ltd ACN 629 590 585 (Holon). Holon is a corporate authorised representative (CAR number 1276082) of Atlas Funds Management Pty Ltd ACN 612 499 528 (AFS licence number 491395). The information provided in this article is general in nature and does not constitute investment advice or personal financial product advice. This information has not taken into account your investment objectives, particular needs or financial situation. Before acting on any information contained in this article, each person should obtain independent taxation, financial and legal advice relating to this information and consider it carefully before making any decision on recommendations. Any opinions or forecasts reflect the judgment and assumptions of Holon on the basis of information at the date of publication and may later change without notice. Any projections contained in this communication are estimates only and may not be realised in the future. Returns from investments may fluctuate. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. All investments carry risks, including that the value of investments may vary and that your capital is not guaranteed. Whilst all care has been taken in preparation of this article, Holon gives no representation or warranty as to the reliability, completeness or accuracy of the information contained in this article. Holon accepts no liability for any inaccurate, incomplete or omitted information of any kind or any losses caused by using this information. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Holon will not be liable in any way for any loss or damage suffered by you through use or reliance on this information. Holon’s liability for negligence, breach of contract or contravention of any law, which cannot be lawfully excluded, is limited. Holon Photon Fund: The responsible entity for the Holon Photon Fund (ARSN 633 803 497) (the Fund) is One Managed Investment Funds Limited (ACN 117 400 987) (AFSL 297042) (OMIFL). Holon is the investment manager for the Holon Photon Fund. The content of this article does not constitute an offer or solicitation to subscribe for units in the Funds or an offer to buy or sell any financial product. Accordingly, reliance should not be placed on this article as the basis for making an investment, financial or other decision. You should also consult a licensed financial adviser before making an investment decision in relation to the Fund. Any investment in OMIFL products need to be made in accordance with and after reading the Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Additional Information Booklet (AIB) and Target Market Determination (TMD). Investors should consider the PDS, AIB and TMD before deciding whether to invest in the Fund or continue to hold units in the Fund. Applications for units in the Fund can only be made pursuant to the application form relevant to the Fund. The PDS, AIB and TMD can be obtained by visiting www.oneinvestment.com.au/photon.

Tim Davies
Director of Research
Holon Global Investments

Tim has worked at Goldman Sachs in London and New York, covering European and UK based hedge funds, and in Australia as an investment analyst and China-focused portfolio manager at Consolidated Press Holdings, Ellerston Capital and Caledonia.

Expertise

No areas of expertise

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.