Aussie banks driving lucrative void in private debt

Phil Strano

Yarra Capital Management

Australian private debt has been a relatively happy hunting ground for astute institutional investors over the last decade, with a shallower pool of buyers and illiquidity premiums helping to drive higher risk-adjusted returns. With stringent bank capital adequacy regimes in place, the opportunity for institutional investors to access enhanced returns is likely to endure for some time.

Post the GFC, and in the lead up to the adoption of tighter capital adequacy standards in 2012, Australia’s major banks significantly increased their residential mortgage books (from ~57% of lending in 2008 to ~66% today (see Chart 1)). Yet over the same period, corporate lending declined from 28% to 25% today, meaning the private debt lending books of the major banks have proportionally fallen over the past 10 years by at least $60 billion. 

Chart 1: Major Banks – Residential Mortgages as % of Total Loans and Advances

As for the tightening of capital adequacy requirements, APRA now compels banks to set aside capital based on prescribed risk weightings, with investment grade (IG) and sub-investment grade (HY) debt requiring an additional 100% and 150% in capital compared to just 35% for residential mortgages (see Table 1).

Table 1: APS112 Risk Weights

As for the tightening of capital adequacy requirements, APRA now compels banks to set aside capital based on prescribed risk weightings, with investment grade (IG) and sub-investment grade (HY) debt requiring an additional 100% and 150% in capital compared to just 35% for residential mortgages (see Table 1).

In the post-GFC environment of low impairments (see Chart 2) and tighter capital adequacy, Australia’s banks have unsurprisingly sought growth in residential mortgages over private debt in order to maximise risk-weighted returns on equity (ROE). The Financial Services Royal Commission is only reinforcing this trend, with new standards set to add to an already risk-averse mindset.

Chart 2: Low Impairments and Net Losses (Pre-LMI)

So what does this mean for institutional investors? With the banks’ appetite for private debt constrained, opportunities for discerning investors to boost carry and add a layer of sustainable, defensive income are on the rise. Regulatory constraints are likely to maintain a steady pipeline of deals offering attractive return profiles and investor-friendly covenant protections (e.g. Debt/EBITA and interest cover).

As fundamental and multi-sector credit investors, we see significant opportunities to earn higher risk-adjusted returns in the Australian private debt market. We currently favour 3-5 year BB-rated opportunities, which offer strong returns at Cash +350-500 bps.


Phil Strano
Portfolio Manager
Yarra Capital Management

Phil is the lead portfolio manager for Yarra Capital Management’s Higher Income Strategy. A credit specialist, Phil has more than 20 years experience in financial markets across asset management and institutional banking.

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.

Comments

Sign In or Join Free to comment