Choose your own valuation metric

Martin Pretty

Equitable Investors

As a child, I enjoyed reading "Choose Your Own Adventure" books where the reader assumed the role of the lead character and made decisions that determined what happened next. Then I was thrown into a world of finance in the year 2000 where some investors were sticking with the discipline of multiples of earnings and discounted cash flows but a separate cohort was choosing a different adventure, getting excited about share prices relative to "eyeballs" (website visitors) and clicks.

The "eyeballs" metrics choice was a bad one that had a disappointing ending. But there's always new valuation metrics emerging. What seems to be a popular choice right now is to look at Enterprise Value (market cap + debt - cash) relative to Gross Merchandise Value - EV/GMV.

EM/GMV is being applied to online marketplaces and Buy Now Pay Later players. It is valuing companies relative to the total value of transactions that it facilitates - for example the total value of goods sold on eBay. But GMV doesn't really tell you much about the economics of a business. 

eBay, the granddaddy of online marketplaces, turns just under 11% of GMV into revenue, while craft market Etsy takes about 17%. Among ASX listings, Freelancer (FLN) takes 6.6% of transactions as revenue and the prospectus for recent IPO Airtasker (ART) forecast its revenue will be 17% of GMV. Figure 1 compares ASX-listed marketplace businesses reporting GMV or the equivalent and their conversion of GMV into revenue and gross profit.

Figure 1: ASX-listed comparisons of margins on GMV

Source: Equitable Investors, company data

All other things being equal, higher EV/GMV multiples should be applied to the companies with higher rates of conversion of GMV to revenue.

But all things aren't equal. The growth potential is obviously a key factor. So is the amount of marketing spend and corporate overheads.

If you use EV/GMV as a valuation benchmark, you are making assumptions about the relative scalability of the business, the scope for sharing in customer spend and the required marketing spend to support sales (the Customer Acquisition Cost - CAC). Then there the cost of keeping the offering up to ever-increasing customer expectations - probably reflected in development spend. 

The following chart, Figure 2, sets out how two leading players in the BNPL space have had very different approaches to marketing spend relative to revenue over the past few years.

Figure 2: Comparison of marketing spend by two leading BNPL players

Source: Goldman Sachs (March 17, 2021)

For our investment adventures we continue to choose a path incorporating the actual economic share of transactions a company can be expected to earn and the cost structure.

If a business is expected to be loss-making in the near-term, the tools of choice would be to discount forecast future cashflows and/or to calculate the Lifetime Value of the customer base and whether the cost of acquiring customers is rewarded appropriately.

There's a fair chance that EV/GMV may have a similar ending to "eyeballs" as a valuation tool.

Not already a Livewire member?

Sign up today to get free access to investment ideas and strategies from Australia’s leading investors.

........
Nothing in this article constitutes investment advice. Neither the information, commentary or any opinion contained in this article constitutes a solicitation or offer by Equitable Investors Pty Ltd (EI) or its affiliates to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments. Delivery of this article to a recipient should not be relied on as a representation that the information contained remains accurate or complete at any time after the preparation date. EI does not guarantee or make any representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the information in this article. To the extent permitted by law, EI disclaims all liability that may otherwise arise due to any information in this report being inaccurate or information being omitted.

7 stocks mentioned

Martin Pretty
Martin Pretty
Director
Equitable Investors

Martin established Equitable Investors and the Dragonfly Fund in 2017 after serving as an investment manager with Thorney Investment Group. Equitable seeks out unique opportunities with intensive research and constructive corporate engagement

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.

Comments

Sign In or Join Free to comment