Like hybrids? Try global hybrids

Global fixed income and credit markets have had a historically weak 12 months of performance as surging inflation has seen global central banks make fast-paced globally coordinated rate hikes. The performance of global bank hybrids has also been negatively impacted.

This underperformance of global bank hybrids has opened up an opportunity for active investors to capture much higher yields, particularly when compared with ASX hybrids. Currently, the Yield (AUD hedged) on hybrids issued by highly rated European and U.S. banks ranges from 7.2% to 11.2%, which is 2-3% higher than Australian Major bank hybrids.

The total return for the 12 months to October 2022 for the Global Contingent Convertible securities index (CoCos) (AUD hedged) was -15.6%. The average price for the securities in the index has fallen to $85. In contrast, ASX-listed bank hybrids have been relatively stable, returning 1.7% over the same time period and are trading at an average price of $102.

The relative value of offshore hybrids has increased

Sources: Bloomberg, Bentham up until 31 Oct 2022. ASX Major Hybrids represented as an equal weight index

Sources: Bloomberg, Bentham up until 31 Oct 2022. ASX Major Hybrids represented as an equal weight index

Similar credit risk, but higher yields

The financial strength of Australian banks is well known by Australian investors who are comfortable in retaining exposure to ASX hybrids. We believe that this comfort has driven Australian Major Bank ASX hybrids to currently trade at low Credit Margins by global standards. Reflective of this relative mispricing, Australia’s major banks also issue non-AUD hybrids to global institutional investors, which are currently trading at higher yields than comparable ASX securities.

These non-AUD securities trade in credit markets alongside hybrids issued by other highly rated global banks such as; BNP Paribas, JP Morgan and Rabobank. These securities have a comparable credit risk to ASX major bank hybrids but provide higher credit spreads or risk premia over benchmark yields.

As with all hybrids, security terms are important to security selection. There are some modest structural differences between the ASX Hybrids and the global hybrids. The impact primarily revolves around greater uncertainty about when the notes will be repaid. Even after taking this into account, we believe the additional yield from global securities more than compensates for this extra risk.

More yield in global hybrids for comparable credit risk

Extension risk arrives down-under

A key investment risk in all bank hybrids is that they do not have a fixed maturity date and may not be redeemed at the next relevant call date. This risk is referred to as ‘extension risk’, and factors that contribute to this risk include the strength of the issuer, regulatory rules, and financial market conditions at the call date. Analysis of individual security terms is also important as to whether investors are compensated for this risk.

Until now, investors in Australian Major bank capital securities were largely immune to this risk because Australian Major banks routinely repaid capital securities at the first call date. These repayments have occurred even when the newly issued security was more expensive than keeping the existing securities outstanding. This expectation “of always calling” is partly the reason why Australian bank capital securities often trade at lower credit spreads than securities from some similarly rated European and U.S banks, who have on occasion deferred repaying a hybrid if it is the bank’s short-term interest to do so.

The local regulator, APRA, has recently reminded issuers of the existing prudential standards (APS 111), regarding “expectation on capital calls” (1st Nov 2022). These guidelines indicate that Australian banks “should not call an Additional Tier 1 Capital or Tier 2 Capital instrument and replace it with an instrument with a higher credit spread or that is otherwise more expensive” unless certain conditions are satisfied.

We believe extension risk is currently not adequately priced for ASX Hybrids, particularly for securities with low reset spreads (margins). These guidelines, if followed, are also poised to increase the price volatility of ASX bank hybrids over time.

Below we compare the "yield to worst" on a selection of securities. This provides a guide to the worst-case scenario of yields on a selection of securities with a call date. Again, when comparing the lowest yield – either to maturity or the call date, the ASX-listed securities often have far lower yields.

Yield Comparison of Select BBB rated Global CoCos vs Selected ASX Major Bank Hybrids

Look beyond for new sources of income

Bentham invests in institutional quality asset classes that diversify risk while generating regular monthly or quarterly income for investors. Click 'follow' below to hear more of our insights.

(1) yield to worse in local currency terms (2) Similar credit risk: The stand-alone credit ratings of the major Australian banks and the major international banks in the chart on page 2 are within 0-2 notches of each other depending on the rating agency. There are differences in the terms of the capital securities but they sit in the same part of the capital structure as going concern capital. Most of the ASX Major Bank hybrids are not externally rated. Our assumption is that ASX Major Bank hybrids would be rated BBB-, which is in line with their USD issuance rated Baa2/BBB-. Yield to worst or YTW. Is the lowest possible yield on a callable security without defaulting. For example, the yield to maturity or even perpetuity may be lower than the yield to the next call date and vice versa What are capital securities? They are commonly called hybrid securities in Australia Purpose – Banks issue capital securities to meet regulatory capital standards. These are issued in addition to common equity to help ensure a bank has sufficient capital to absorb losses and protect senior creditors Issuers - Banks and insurers issue for the purpose of satisfying their regulatory capital requirements Income – Typically capital securities have greater stability in coupon payments than ordinary bank dividends Capital repayment - Repayment of principal at a future call or maturity date, subject to regulatory approval. The maturity risk is they are never redeemed or are converted into equity Risk - Designed to absorb losses in periods of severe financial stress Liquidity – Capital securities are mostly traded globally by institutional investors in generally liquid markets Credit ratings - Vast majority of capital securities market is rated by major credit rating agencies e.g. S&P, Moody’s or Fitch Regulatory status – Bank capital is classified as either tier one or tier two capital - Tier one securities are referred to Additional Tier 1 capital or AT1. Issues from European and Asian Banks are often referred to as “CoCos” – short for contingent capital securities. In the U.S they are often referred to as “prefs” – short for preference shares. These securities rank ahead of common equity in liquidations but behind other creditors - Tier two securities are often referred to as subordinated debt. These rank senior to preference shares of a bank (tier one) but are subordinated to senior creditors Disclaimer This material has been prepared by Bentham Asset Management ABN 92 140 833 674 AFSL 356199 (Bentham), the investment manager of VanEck Bentham Global Capital Securities Active ETF (Managed Fund). This is general information only and not financial advice. Read the PDS and speak to a financial adviser to consider if GCAP is appropriate for your circumstances. The PDS and TMD are available at GCAP is subject to investment risks, including possible loss of capital invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. No member of the VanEck group of companies gives any guarantee or assurance as to the repayment of capital, the payment of income, the performance, or any particular rate of return from GCAP. Benchmark information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but VanEck does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. VanEck Investments Limited (ACN 146 596 116 AFSL 416755) (VanEck) is the issuer and responsible entity of all VanEck exchange trades funds (Funds) listed on the ASX. This is general advice only and does not take into account any person’s financial objectives, situation or needs. The product disclosure statement (PDS) and the target market determination (TMD) for all Funds are available at You should consider whether or not an investment in any Fund is appropriate for you. Investments in a Fund involve risks associated with financial markets. These risks vary depending on a Fund’s investment objective. Refer to the applicable PDS and TMD for more details on risks. Investment returns and capital are not guaranteed.

Richard Quin
Managing Director

Richard Quin is the CEO, founding Partner, and Lead Portfolio Manager of Bentham Asset Management, a specialist global fixed interest, and credit investment manager based in Sydney.


I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.


Sign In or Join Free to comment