Lithium is a fully charged opportunity

While the lithium sector continues to exhibit significant volatility, the structural outlook for lithium remains positive.
Rob Crookston

Wilsons Advisory

Critically, the structural outlook for lithium remains intact, which should support attractive long-term lithium prices and, by extension, significant cash generation from lithium producers.

Therefore, current weakness in the lithium sector should be seen as an attractive buying opportunity for investors.

Cyclical pressures, not structural

Lithium prices have come under pressure in recent months on the back of headwinds that are cyclical (not structural) in nature, which has weighed on share prices of the ASX listed miners, including our positions in Mineral Resources (ASX: MIN) and Allkem (ASX: AKE). The lithium carbonate spot price hit an all-time high of about $80 per kilogram of LCE (lithium carbonate equivalent) in November 2022, before falling back to its current price of ~$25 per kilogram of LCE.

The fall in price has primarily been driven by cyclical concerns around the pace of China’s electric vehicle (EV) uptake and the potential for oversupply as new projects come online.

However, the structural drivers are still intact, and the current sell-off appears overdone. Demand growth over the next decade should remain strong and supply will underwhelm consensus, in our view.

Figure 1: Spot lithium price has fallen closer to the long-term consensus forecast in the past month

China’s macro weakness a temporary issue

The underwhelming recovery of the world’s second largest economy and largest EV market has weighed on sentiment towards the lithium sector.

China has experienced cyclical softness in demand for EVs this year, driven by a subdued consumer backdrop, which has been exacerbated by inventory destocking by battery cell manufacturers, which we believe is nearly over.

Despite the immediate challenges in China, the long-term structural demand story for EVs remains strong.

China’s recent renewal of a tax break extension for EV purchases to 2025 should help to steady sector growth over the medium-term, while the headline data looks increasingly positive with China recording a record month of EV sales in August, with sales increasing +35% YoY, signaling the worst is over for the sector.

The prospect of further fiscal support aimed at stimulating Chinese household demand also presents a potential catalyst for the EV sector and the lithium price over the coming months.

Figure 2: China EV sales are at record levels : we expect sales to continue to grow over the next decade

Supply perfection improbable

Oversupply is a concern for the market. The most common bear case towards the lithium sector is that the market will be flooded with new supply as prospectors/explorers/miners ramp up their investments, incentivised by elevated spot prices.

However, given... the significance of demand over the next decade, stemming from the rapid transition to EVs, it is difficult to see a scenario where overall supply can keep up with the scale of expected demand this decade, with industry heavyweight Albemarle estimating that ~100 new projects will be needed by 2030 to support demand.

While a significant amount of new supply is forecast this decade, significant risks loom over consensus supply expectations. This is due to the growing prevalence of cost overruns and delays across lithium projects. Increases to growth/sustaining CAPEX combined with longer build timelines across the sector could put upward pressure on the lithium cost curve, which is likely to support higher commodity prices, all else equal.

Supply issues for lithium projects are likely to remain as:

  • Supply Delays Common: Mining projects commonly experience delays ranging from 7 months to 2.5 years, with little room in supply forecasts for such setbacks. A Mckinsey study suggests that just around 20% of mining and metal projects are completed within their designated timelines and budgets.
  • Labour Shortages: Persistent shortages in skilled labor continue to impact the industry.
  • Industry Immaturity: The lithium sector, unlike traditional resources like iron ore and copper, lacks the established knowledge and intellectual property needed for rapid supply expansion, intensifying the challenges.
  • US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA): ~60% of new supply is expected from countries without a US FTA (free trade agreement), and will be challenged to qualify as ‘IRA compliant’. Therefore, the increase in US demand will not be met with eligible supply. The US is expected to be the third largest market for lithium hydroxide by 2030.

Figure 3: Mining project timeline delays are commonplace

Structural demand drivers still going strong

Looking past the cyclical volatility, the structural trend for lithium remains steadfast. Electric vehicle (EV) demand is poised to continue growing strongly in the latter half of this decade, in line with the targets and legislation announced by governments globally.

Global EV penetration is projected to reach 50% by 2030, with the number of EVs on the road expected to surge by 3.4 times current levels by the same year.

Figure 4: EV demand is forecast to continue to grow at a fast pace over the second half of this decade

By the decade's end, the lithium market is anticipated to face a substantial deficit as demand outpaces supply. We do not think supply delays are adequately reflected in consensus expectations, which could exacerbate the forecast shortfall.

The prospect of worsening supply deficits presents upside risk to the lithium price, in our view. Should the market anticipate this deficit, prices are likely to rally as battery manufacturers rush to secure lithium reserves before the deficit materialises. Therefore, there is a risk the long-term consensus price rises over the medium term.

Figure 5: Battery grade lithium market deficit is expected to grow out to 2040, driven by significant demand and tight supply

Figure 6: There is upside risk to consensus price forecasts if a supply deficit is realised in the long term

What Are We Looking for?

We want to hold lithium miners that have 3 key characteristics:

  1. Production growth - firms poised to become industry leaders with reduced dependency on elevated prices to increase cash flow.
  2. Generating cash to fund production growth - investors in this fledgling sector are cautious about potential capital raises.
  3. Maintaining low production costs - a crucial factor for sustaining cash flow during challenging periods.

Allkem (AKE)

  • Production is expected to triple by FY26 from FY23, from ~30kt to ~100kt. Growth will not be finished there with consensus expected production to increase by ~140kt by the end of the decade.
  • Even with capex associated with growth, AKE is expected to generate a free cash flow (FCF) yield of 7.7% in FY24. AKE also has ~US$1bn of cash on the balance sheet, and in a net cash position.
  • The majority of AKE’s production comes from lithium carbonate. Lithium carbonate is lower cost than hard-rock spodumene.

Other factors:

  • AKE has a strong management team
  • AKE will benefit from synergies from the Livent merger
  • Diversified production by lithium type (both lithium carbonate and spodumene) and geography (Argentina, Australia, Canada, Japan).

Figure 7: AKE production is expected to drive revenue growth over the medium term

Mineral Resources (MIN)

  • Production is expected to double by FY25 from FY23, from ~400kt to ~800kt. Spodumene production is expected to hit over 1,000kt by FY27.
  • Balance sheet has $1.4bn of cash and net debt/EBITDA at 1x. Substantial capex costs this year, but we think the balance sheet is manageable, albeit tight. MIN shareholders will reap the rewards from FY25 onwards.
    • Management needs to execute this half. We are wary that management strategy has been relatively unpredictable. Disciplined delivery will be key to unlock value. If management cannot do this over the next quarter, it will be a red flag to our investment thesis.
  • MIN’s lithium projects are reasonably low cost, in line with peers such as Pilbara Minerals Ltd (ASX: PLS).
  • MIN provides optionality on iron ore. Stimulus from China aimed at the domestic property sector would benefit iron ore miners.

Figure 8: MIN’s production is expected to drive revenue growth over the medium term

Figure 9: Fundamental metrics

Want more insights like this?

WILSONS thinks differently and delves deeper to uncover a broad range of interesting investment opportunities for its clients. To read more of our latest research, visit our Research and Insights.


........
Disclaimer and Disclosures About Wilsons: Wilsons is a financial advisory firm focused on delivering strategic and investment advice for people with ambition – whether they be a private investor, corporate, fund manager or global institution. Its client-first, whole of firm approach allows Wilsons to partner with clients for the long-term and provide the wide range of financial and advisory services they may require throughout their financial future. Wilsons is staff-owned and has offices across Australia. Disclaimer: This communication has been prepared by Wilsons Advisory and Stockbroking Limited (ACN 010 529 665; AFSL 238375) and/or Wilsons Corporate Finance Limited (ACN 057 547 323; AFSL 238383) (collectively “Wilsons”). It is being supplied to you solely for your information and no action should be taken on the basis of or in reliance on this communication. To the extent that any information prepared by Wilsons contains a financial product advice, it is general advice only and has been prepared by Wilsons without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider the appropriateness of the advice in light of your own objectives, financial situation and needs before following or relying on the advice. You should also obtain a copy of, and consider, any relevant disclosure document before making any decision to acquire or dispose of a financial product. Wilsons’ Financial Services Guide is available at wilsonsadvisory.com.au/disclosures. All investments carry risk. Different investment strategies can carry different levels of risk, depending on the assets that make up that strategy. The value of investments and the level of returns will vary. Future returns may differ from past returns and past performance is not a reliable guide to future performance. On that basis, any advice should not be relied on to make any investment decisions without first consulting with your financial adviser. If you do not currently have an adviser, please contact us and we would be happy to connect you with a Wilsons representative. To the extent that any specific documents or products are referred to, please also ensure that you obtain the relevant disclosure documents such as Product Disclosure Statement(s), Prospectus(es) and Investment Program(s) before considering any related investments. Wilsons and their associates may have received and may continue to receive fees from any company or companies referred to in this communication (the “Companies”) in relation to corporate advisory, underwriting or other professional investment services. Please see relevant Wilsons’ disclosures at www.wilsonsadvisory.com.au/disclosures.

1 topic

3 stocks mentioned

Rob Crookston
Rob Crookston
Wilsons Advisory
I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.

Comments

Sign In or Join Free to comment