Magellan Global Fund – A peer and benchmark relative analysis

A lot has been said and written about Magellan lately but we have not seen a ‘post-mortem’ conducted on a peer and benchmark relativity basis. Until now. In this wire, Rodney Lay, from Risk Return Metrics, explains the fourfold value of such an analysis.
Rodney Lay

Risk Return Metrics

A lot has been said and written about Magellan lately but we have not seen a ‘post mortem’ conducted on a peer and benchmark relativity basis. We see the potential value of such analysis as primarily fourfold: 

  1. Highlighting where investment management may need to change; 
  2. If nothing is changing at Magellan (as seems to have been the message from last Friday’s briefing), then what are the potential risks; 
  3. For investors considering redeeming, pointing to comparable investment strategies in the peer group tables, and; 
  4. Potentially giving investors a more informed basis in which to make a decision (the data does not lie).

It is money weighted performance that matters to the bulk of investors 

One very important point to make at the outset: Time weighted performance is not money weighted performance. By Dec 2012, MGF’s retail investor FUM was slightly over $2bn. By 30 June 2020, it had grown to $26.8bn. Over this period, MGF underperformed both the Peer Index and the MSCI World (see chart in report). That is, most investors (the Money Weighted performance) have experienced relative underperformance by being invested in MGF. It is all well and good to say that “Magellan has created billions of dollars of value” but the real question is whether the bulk of the dollars invested (bulk of the investors) enjoyed relative outperformance. The fact of the matter is they have not and this during a period in global equities favourable to the Magellan Growth, Quality, Mega-Cap investment style. 

A peer group and benchmark performance assessment

The tables and charts in the report detail key risk/return metrics of RRM’s universe of Australian-domiciled broad, developed market global equities unlisted managed funds as well as the benchmark index, the MSCI World ex Australia index. Why are we using an unlisted managed fund universe and not an ETF universe? Because the ETMF and unlisted managed fund versions of MGF are identical and the unlisted managed fund sector provides a greater number of relevant mandates and that have sufficient track records – the Active ETF sector currently does not or for many relevant ETMFs, the track-record is too short.

It might be stating the obvious, but peer relativity analysis (versus just comparing to a benchmark index) is useful in that it can reveal, in a relative sense, manager skill and draw attention to investment mandate alternatives, notwithstanding that different mandates may have key objective differences.

We table four key measures: returns, risk, capital preservation (drawdown) and efficiency (capture ratios). All of these measures would be clearly understood bar the efficiency ratios, a seriously utilised performance measure in RRM’s view. Just ask Magellan – they publish a Downmarket Capture Ratio (but that is an incomplete measure without a corresponding Upmarket Capture Ratio). So, we explain these ratios at the end of this piece.

Download the PDF to access the full ETF Flows report

Click on the pdf below to access the full report and the key conclusions, being:

  • It has been a long time between Outperformance drinks:
  • Capital Preservation – Solid, but not as Solid as may first appear;
  • Manager Efficiency – Where the rubber hits the road;
  • It could be a long way back;
  • Magellan’s positioning in 2020 was unique. 

........
Livewire gives readers access to information and educational content provided by financial services professionals and companies ("Livewire Contributors"). Livewire does not operate under an Australian financial services licence and relies on the exemption available under section 911A(2)(eb) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in respect of any advice given. Any advice on this site is general in nature and does not take into consideration your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before making a decision please consider these and any relevant Product Disclosure Statement. Livewire has commercial relationships with some Livewire Contributors.

3 stocks mentioned

Rodney Lay
Rodney Lay
Risk Return Metrics

Investment analyst with particular experience in listed and unlisted investment strategies, equities and structured products.

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.

Comments

Sign In or Join Free to comment