Don't spoil your festive season with market forecasts

As the calendar flips over to December, attention naturally shifts to the year ahead. As you work your way through Christmas parties, presents, and an overdue vacation, you will likely also find yourself with an inbox full of economic and market forecasts from various financial commentators. In them you will find confident predictions for what lies in store for equity markets in 2022, based on the forecaster’s outlook for inflation, monetary policy, elections, supply chain, COVID-19 and so on. What’s in store for 2022? You will read plenty of answers to this question, but before you do anything about it consider this.
Stephen Arnold

Aoris Investment Management

As the calendar flips over to December, attention naturally shifts to the year ahead. What’s in store for 2022? You will read plenty of answers to this question, but before you do anything about it consider this.

It is the silly season after all. As you work your way through Christmas parties, presents, and an overdue vacation, you will likely also find yourself with an inbox full of economic and market forecasts from various financial commentators. In them you will find confident predictions for what lies in store for equity markets in 2022, based on the forecaster’s outlook for inflation, monetary policy, elections, supply chain, COVID-19 and so on. Let’s see what history tells us about how the accuracy of such market outlooks.

Market forecasts are usually derived from multi-part assumptions, meaning a forecaster assumes A will happen, because of which B will then happen. For example: “central banks will tighten monetary policy in 2022, as a result of which equity markets will decline.” With multi-part assumptions, the likelihood of being correct is calculated by multiplying together the odds of each proposition. If a forecaster has a 70% chance of being right with their outlook for tighter monetary policy, and the chance that the equity market declines because of tighter monetary policy is 70%, then the probability that the forecast proves correct is 70% times 70% which equals 49%. These are worse odds than tossing a coin, which should be pause for thought. The more assumptions embedded in the proposition, the less likely it is to prove correct.

Market timing involves such complex, multi-part assumptions, which is why the odds of success are low. CXO Advisory Group tracked US equity market forecasts from 68 strategists who publish their outlooks publicly, referred to by CXO as ‘market gurus’. Over the period 1998 to 2012 these gurus made 6,582 forecasts with an average accuracy rate of 48%, meaning they were correct less than half the time. The results were studied by Wim Artoons in a 2016 article ‘Market Timing: Opportunities and Risk’. Artoons concluded that 

‘after transaction costs, no single market timer was able to make money’.

Aswath Damodaran, who today is Professor of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business, has studied market timing strategies. He looked at asset allocation mutual funds in the US, so called because, rather than being 100% equities they can time the market by moving between stocks and bonds and cash. As such, they should do better than the equity market. 

Over the 10 years to 1998 these market timing funds on average underperformed the S&P 500 by 5.0% p.a.

So much for timing the market. What about identifying growth thematics? Could 2022 be the year of biotech, robotics, AI? Perhaps it’s the year that EVs go mass market. Once again, the data is not encouraging. 

Thematic funds on average underperformed the broader equity market by 3.0% p.a. over the period 2000 to 2019 (Swiss Finance Institute).

As humans, we are naturally impressed by complex approaches. It’s intuitive to believe that outperforming the market requires the sophisticated, multi-part reasoning we hear from those expressing market timing and thematic investment views. The facts tell a different story.

It’s also human nature to be drawn to crystal balls. Being told the future takes away the anxiety which comes with uncertainty. However, the future is unknowable, and we have to make peace with that. In equity investing, living with uncertainty is much easier when we realise that much of what most participants and commentators fret about, such as election outcomes and monetary policy, has very little bearing on long-term outcomes.

As an alternative to anticipating the next year in financial markets and positioning yourself accordingly, I offer the following:

  1. Focus on the main game, which is long-term investment outcomes. To do this, let go of the need to maximise short-term results. Trying to be on the right side of all the inevitable zigs and zags in the market along the way is more likely to detract from than enhance long-term returns.
  2. Recognise uncertainty through owning only all-weather businesses. If inflation is a risk, which it always is, avoid businesses which suffer lasting damage through inflation.
  3. Own winning businesses, those that not only outgrow their peers in normal times but positively thrive competitively in difficult conditions.

If you’d like to know more visit our website

........
This report has been prepared by Aoris Investment Management Pty Ltd ABN 11 621 586 552, AFSL No 507281 (Aoris), the investment manager of Aoris International Fund (Fund). The issuer of units in Aoris International Fund is the Fund’s responsible entity The Trust Company (RE Services) Limited (ABN 45 003 278 831, AFSL License No 235150). The Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) contains all of the details of the offer. Copies of the PDS are available at aoris.com.au or can be obtained by contacting Aoris directly. Before making any decision to make or hold any investment in the Fund you should consider the PDS in full. The information provided does not take into account your investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. You should consider your own investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs before acting upon any information provided and consider seeking advice from a financial advisor if necessary. You should not base an investment decision simply on past performance. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance. Returns are not guaranteed and so the value of an investment may rise or fall.

1 topic

Stephen Arnold
Managing Director & Chief Investment Officer
Aoris Investment Management

Stephen founded Aoris Investment Management in 2017 and has been investing internationally for around 25 years. Prior to Aoris, Stephen was Head of International Equities at Evans & Partners where he directly managed $1bn of client assets.

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.

Comments

Sign In or Join Free to comment