Evergrande and equity market ructions

David Berthon-Jones

Aequitas Investment Partners

So far, the equity market has only fallen a few percentage points. A lot of ink spilled for a relatively modest market reaction. (Examples: here, here and here to list only a few.)

Evergrande, the embattled Chinese property developer, has been "embattled" for much of the past year, and the newish news (escalating fears that the company is bankrupt, with minimal expectation of policy support) doesn’t change our overarching narrative all that much.

What do we mean by this?

Well, for a long time we’ve been underweight emerging market (EM) equities, because we think China is:

 a) over-geared with an unsustainable model of economic growth reliant on ever expanding household credit and fixed asset investment, and 

b) a very large part of the EM index, which makes the EM region unattractive.

So the Evergrande issues are really just confirmation of a view we already hold. Will Evergrande be a “Lehman” moment for China?
Well, probably not.

The Lehman’s moment, to us, was about counterparty risk, and the ensuing collapse in credit (credit crunch) that ensnared even otherwise quite solvent businesses. That contagion effect, from not knowing who you could trust, who you could lend to, was the real villain, and here, China (as the “collective”) either owns, directs, or influences both sides of the trade, which makes it less likely that unrelated sectors will be suddenly denied access to credit. Michael Pettis, the famous academic and China commentator, makes this point more forcefully here, for those wishing to read more. 

Most of the debt is local debt (which makes it difficult to get a “sudden stop” balance-of-payments type crisis going, the usual hallmark of an EM financial crises), and in any case China has several trillion in USD denominated foreign reserves, more than sufficient to buy their way out of capital-flows related trouble.

None of that changes the view that mal-investment in unproductive fixed asset investment, or residential property overbuilds, are a very negative backdrop to commodities, where we remain underweight.

Likewise, none of that changes the view that China will go through a likely painful internal readjustment process, rebalancing away from investment orientated growth, towards less commodity-intensive domestic consumption, (e.g. services across healthcare, social security, entertainment, education), and hence we remain underweight EM. 

You could plausibly broaden that out to include a negative outlook for China’s luxury consumer story, which has been one of the longer-running “bull market” narratives used to justify EM overweights (a secular growth story), with dedicated products designed to tap into this part of the market. 

Portfolio positioning

At the level of international shares, well, Evergrande and China are just a part of the broader worry list, which centres on good old fashioned valuations concerns (e.g. are markets overvalued?) and good old fashioned policy forecasting concerns (will tapering and subsequent rate hikes derail markets or the economy, or both, and will fiscal stimulus fade away just as the monetary concerns are lifting?). Nothing really new there.

For the sake of completeness, although it’s not the point of the note, we round those worries out with our other flagship concern, namely how likely is it that corporate profit margins can be maintained at present record highs, given wages growth and the difficulty firms face in passing on those costs.

In our view, equity markets are modestly overvalued, and a correction of at least 10% is eminently possible. There’s nothing special in saying that, markets often have intra-year drawdowns of that magnitude, and that whilst assessing exactly when they will occur is basically impossible, our dynamic asset allocation (DAA) process is designed to reduce the exposure of portfolios to risk where they are more likely. Given our modest current DAA underweight (-3% to international equities, -3% to Australian shares) we are effectively suggesting that now is a more likely environment for a drawdown than normal.

Should equities meaningfully drawdown, we would look to deploy capital into the asset class. With our current overweights to cash and alternatives, and the option of additional underweights to fixed income, we have plenty of firepower (at least 12-16 percentage points) no matter what happens.

And, as it has proved in the past, we think that will likely be enough.

Never miss an insight

Enjoy this wire? Hit the ‘like’ button to let us know. Stay up to date with my content by hitting the ‘follow’ button below and you’ll be notified every time I post a wire. Not already a Livewire member? Sign up today to get free access to investment ideas and strategies from Australia’s leading investors.

This document has been prepared by Aequitas Investment Partners ABN 92 644 165 266 (“Aequitas”, “our”, “we”), a Corporate Authorised Representative (no. 1284389) of C2 Financial Services, (Australian Financial Services Licensee no. 502171), and is for distribution within Australia to wholesale clients and financial advisers only. This document is based on information available at the time of publishing, information which we believe is correct and any opinions, conclusions or forecasts are reasonably held or made as at the time of its compilation, but no warranty is made as to its accuracy, reliability or completeness. To the extent permitted by law, neither Aequitas nor any of its affiliates accept liability to any person for loss or damage arising from the use of the information herein. Please note that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. General Advice Warning: This document has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs, and therefore you should consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. Before making any decision about whether to acquire a financial product, you should obtain and read the relevant Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) or Investor Directed Portfolio Service Guide (IDPS Guide) and consider talking to a financial adviser. Taxation warning: Any taxation considerations are general and based on present taxation laws and may be subject to change. Aequitas is not a registered tax (financial) adviser under the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 and investors should seek tax advice from a registered tax agent or a registered tax (financial) adviser if they intend to rely on this information to satisfy the liabilities or obligations or claim entitlements that arise, or could arise, under a taxation law.

David Berthon-Jones
Co-Chief Investment Officer
Aequitas Investment Partners

David is Co-CIO of Aequitas Investment Partners with Dr Rowan Stewart. David and Rowan are responsible for investment strategy and the delivery of reliable, cost-effective multi-asset, and direct equity portfolio solutions to Advisers, Dealer...

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.