Investor Beware: How Depreciation can be Manipulated to Inflate Earnings

Investors must be aware that the numbers they're using in analysis could well be inflated by simple accounting manipulation. See how to spot it.
Will Simpson

Blue Oceans Capital

Financial statements have been manipulated for as long as they’ve existed. While some manipulations may not be material, others mask more complex problems. Management may resort to such malpractices for financial incentives or worse, to hide problems at the company. Firms have found ways to manipulate financial statements within the confines of GAAP regulations, while still avoiding scrutiny and punishment. Depreciation is a common target, and recording less depreciation to boost income is one of the oldest tricks in the book.


Depreciation is a non-cash charge meant to reflect the decrease in the value of physical assets.

When a physical asset is purchased, it is recorded in the assets section of the balance sheet with no corresponding expense entry on the income statement. As the benefits derived from the asset would extend to more than one reporting period, a portion of the asset’s cost is shifted from the balance sheet to the income statement periodically in the form of depreciation. While this periodic recording is better than recording the entire expense in the beginning, it does not always accurately reflect the amount on the balance sheet or the income statement.


Depreciation can be used to manipulate earnings. By increasing the useful life or the residual value (the expected price at the end of its useful life), annual depreciation can be reduced to minimise its effect on net income.

In 2013, an SEC order found that Hertz, a global car rental company, failed to adequately disclose its decision to extend the planned holding periods (useful life) for substantial portions of its US rental car fleet. The change has the potential to increase risk as the fleet is relying on older vehicles, and stakeholders weren’t informed. This artificially boosted their net income by lowering their depreciation expense for the current quarters, while increasing maintenance costs in the subsequent quarters. Many of the company’s top models, for example, had their planned holding periods extended from 20 to 24 or 30 months 1-3.

How Hertz benefitted from extending their vehicle holding period is explained with the help of the following hypothetical example. There are three things that will determine the depreciation expense on Hertz vehicles: a) the cost to acquire the vehicle; b) how long the company expects to hold it (useful life); and C) the amount it would realise on its disposition at the end of its useful life (residual value).

If a vehicle is purchased for $28,000, and is expected to have a useful life of 4 years and a residual value of $8,000, the depreciation in each of the four years using the straight line method would be $5,000, calculated as follows: ($28,000-$8,000)/4. The amount recorded at the end of each of the four years on the balance sheet, known as the carrying value of the asset, would be $23,000, $18,000, $13,000 and $8,000 respectively.

Upon the disposal of the vehicle, the depreciation expense would need adjustment should a difference exist between the net proceeds it receives for the vehicle and its remaining net book value. If the vehicle is disposed of after four years for $6,000, the difference will be $2,000 ($8,000 book value minus $6,000 selling price). $2,000 would be added to the depreciation expense to account for the difference.

If Hertz increases the useful life of the aforementioned vehicle from 4 years to 5 years, assuming the same residual value of $8,000 at the end of its useful life, the depreciation expense would be calculated as follows : (28,000-8,000)/5 = 4,000. A mere change of one year in the useful life of a single vehicle would be decreasing their depreciation expense by $1,000 and increasing their income by the same amount.

An overstatement in the vehicle’s residual value will increase the loss recognised when a vehicle is sold, but until then, the net income will be boosted by a lower depreciation expense.

Hertz’s infractions did not escape the SEC’s notice. The SEC order required Hertz Global to pay a $16 million penalty for various accounting violations, including, manipulation of depreciation expenses. Without admitting or denying wrongdoing, Hertz CEO and chairman Mr. Mark Frissora agreed to reimburse Hertz $1,982,654, and also pay a $200,000 civil penalty. The settlement required a Judge’s approval4.

While Hertz increased the useful life of its vehicles, Waste Management Inc., an American waste management company, engaged in similar deceitful activities.


Waste Management Inc was found to have inflated the salvage/residual values, and extended the useful lives, of the company’s garbage trucks from 1992 to 19975. In collusion with their auditors, Waste Management Inc. eliminated or deferred current period expenses by extending the useful lives of their garbage trucks and making unwarranted increases to the truck’s residual value. To put it simply, the more their trucks were used, the higher they’d be valued.

The company would get each of its operating units known as “Groups” to record their operating results. The depreciation expense would be recorded using an eight-year useful life and no salvage value. Unbeknownst to the Groups, management were making top-level adjustments. For example in 1993, management assumed a useful life of 12 years and a salvage value of $30,000. A macro calculation was then made to utilise the impact it would have on the operating income6, which artificially decreased quarterly depreciation expenses.


As shown in the examples above, depreciation is a non-cash expense based on management discretion. But there are a few components that can be altered to decrease depreciation expense and boost income. While any changes to the calculation of depreciation should be adequately disclosed to stakeholders, it’s clear that this needs to be monitored.

Assessing the management of depreciation is a key element of the Blue Oceans analysis methodology. It sits alongside a range of other checks-and-balances that are used to unearth any potentially fraudulent activity, all focused on protecting investors’ portfolios.


  1. SEC (2019). | SEC Charges Hertz with Inaccurate Financial Reporting and Other Failures. [online] Available at: (VIEW LINK) [Accessed 16 Feb. 2021].
  2. ?Geller, R., Llp, D., Rudman, S., Kaufman, E. and Capeci, M. (n.d.). CLASS ACTION FOURTH CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. [online] . Available at: (VIEW LINK) [Accessed 16 Feb. 2021].
  3. Jackson, S.G. (2020). An Analysis of Fraud in the Context of Depreciation Manipulation. [online] PDXScholar. Available at: (VIEW LINK) [Accessed 16 Feb. 2021].
  4. Sweet, P. (2019). Ex-Hertz CEO to pay $2m over accounting fraud charges | Accountancy Daily. [online] Available at: (VIEW LINK) [Accessed 25 Feb. 2021].
  5. AsiaOne. (2020). 3 famous stock frauds you may have never heard of… and key lessons for investors. [online] Available at: (VIEW LINK) [Accessed 1 Mar. 2021].
  6. (2021). Complaint: SEC v. Dean L. Buntrock, Phillip B. Rooney, James E. Koenig, Thomas C. Hau, Herbert A. Getz, And Bruce D. Tobecksen. [online] Available at: (VIEW LINK) [Accessed 1 Mar. 2021].
This information is intended only for wholesale clients and must not be forwarded or otherwise made available to anyone who is not a wholesale client. Only investors who are wholesale clients may invest in the Harbourside Capital Blue Oceans MDA. The information provided in this document is general information only and does not constitute investment or other advice. The information is not intended to provide financial product advice to any person. No aspect of this information takes into account the objectives, financial situation or needs of any person. Before making an investment decision, you should read the offer document and (if appropriate) seek professional advice to determine whether the investment is suitable for you. Blue Oceans Capital makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information it provides, or that it should be relied upon and to the maximum extent permitted by law, neither Blue Oceans Capital nor its directors, employees or agents accept any liability for any inaccurate, incomplete or omitted information of any kind or any losses caused by using this information. This information is current as at the date specified and is subject to change. An investment may achieve a lower than expected return and investors risk losing some or all of their principal investment. Blue Oceans Capital does not guarantee repayment of capital or any particular rate of return from its strategy. Past performance is no indication of future performance. Any investment decision in connection with the Strategy should only be made based on the information contained in the relevant Information Memorandum.

Will Simpson
Portfolio Manager / Director
Blue Oceans Capital

As investors, we have tremendous power to create change. Business enables evolution but investors enable business. Blue Oceans Capital exists to drive investment into sustainable companies and to make a difference.

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.


Please sign in to comment on this wire.