Markets are down, but earnings are not...yet

Bruno Paulson

Morgan Stanley IM

The equity markets have had a terrible first half of 2022, with the MSCI World Index down over 20% in U.S. dollars (USD), the worst start to the year in over 50 years. The bizarre element is that the fall has all been down to derating, as earnings have not yet been hit. 

The earnings estimates for 2022 and 2023 are both up slightly, meaning that the 12-month forward earnings number is up 5% this year as it benefits from the increasing weight of the higher 2023 estimate as the year progresses.

The derating is arguably less bizarre given the extreme multiple at the start of the year, which at 19.3x forward earnings was 36% above the average between 2003 and 2019, the 17-year period between the bursting of the tech bubble and the pandemic – during which the multiple never even reached 17x. The derating has taken the multiple down to 14.6x, only 3% above the 2003-19 average. 

This has clearly reduced the multiple risks from here, shifting our concern to the prospects for earnings.

Unfortunately, there are plenty of grounds to be anxious about earnings, even if inflation helps revenue growth, at least in nominal terms. The major threat in the short term is the prospect of an economic slowdown or recession. Central banks are attempting to counter inflation by dampening demand through higher rates. They are hoping to calibrate their rate rises to achieve a soft landing, and economic forecasts seem to think that this is achievable, with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) predicting 1-2% growth for the USA and the euro area for 2023, with inflation falling and unemployment only rising marginally. 

The issue is that monetary policy can be analogous to trying to shift a brick by pulling on an elastic band – there is no effect until suddenly the central bank, along with the economy as a whole, gets a brick in the face. What is clear is that there are no signs of any risk of a downturn in the current earnings numbers, given the continued robustness of the estimates.

The risk to earnings is raised further by the current record level of margins, with the MSCI World Index forward EBIT1 margin edging up further to 16.7% this year, as against a 13.3% average and a 15.2% peak in the 2003-19 period. 

It seems that the excess demand is allowing companies to pass on even more than the rise in their input costs, be it through inflation (raising prices), ‘shrinkflation’ (reducing product sizes), or ‘skimpflation’ (trimming the level of services).

Any end to shortages, or worse still a shift to excess supply, could end this phase of generalised pricing power. Commodities-exposed companies tend to suffer while genuine pricing power holds up better. In the longer term, there could be further pressures on earnings, be they from rises in interest costs, the need to build more resilient supply chains, companies paying for the negative externalities they create, and even potentially from higher corporate tax rates as governments look to repair their finances.

The Global Financial Crisis of 2008-9 provides an interesting precedent. The market peaked in October 2007. The first phase of the market fall was a drop of 15% over the next eight months to the summer of 2008, even though forward earnings rose, as the market derated – a clear parallel to the 2022 experience so far. It was only in the second half of 2008 that the earnings started to fall sharply, along with a further erosion in multiples, to arrive at the market trough another eight months later in early 2009.

Whatever happens from here in 2022-23 will not be a repeat of 2008-9. However, the market’s earnings are distinctly vulnerable given their current elevated level and the probable economic slowdown. Our focus on compounders, with recurring revenues and pricing power, should mean that the portfolio’s earnings are more robust than those of the market, as was shown in 2008-9 and more recently in the first half of 2020 during the COVID-19 crisis. 

Given that earnings are the major risk from here, after the significant derating that has already happened, it arguably makes sense to minimise earnings risk from here by owning compounders.

1 Earnings Before Interest and Taxation

Risk Considerations There is no assurance that a portfolio will achieve its investment objective. Portfolios are subject to market risk, which is the possibility that the market value of securities owned by the portfolio will decline. Market values can change daily due to economic and other events (e.g. natural disasters, health crises, terrorism, conflicts and social unrest) that affect markets, countries, companies or governments. It is difficult to predict the timing, duration, and potential adverse effects (e.g. portfolio liquidity) of events. Accordingly, you can lose money investing in this strategy. Please be aware that this strategy may be subject to certain additional risks. Changes in the worldwide economy, consumer spending, competition, demographics and consumer preferences, government regulation and economic conditions may adversely affect global franchise companies and may negatively impact the strategy to a greater extent than if the strategy’s assets were invested in a wider variety of companies. In general, equity securities’ values also fluctuate in response to activities specific to a company. Investments in foreign markets entail special risks such as currency, political, economic, and market risks. Stocks of small- and mid-capitalisation companies carry special risks, such as limited product lines, markets and financial resources, and greater market volatility than securities of larger, more established companies. The risks of investing in emerging market countries are greater than risks associated with investments in foreign developed markets. Derivative instruments may disproportionately increase losses and have a significant impact on performance. They also may be subject to counterparty, liquidity, valuation, correlation and market risks. Illiquid securities may be more difficult to sell and value than publicly traded securities (liquidity risk). Non-diversified portfolios often invest in a more limited number of issuers. As such, changes in the financial condition or market value of a single issuer may cause greater volatility. ESG strategies that incorporate impact investing and/or Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) factors could result in relative investment performance deviating from other strategies or broad market benchmarks, depending on whether such sectors or investments are in or out of favor in the market. As a result, there is no assurance ESG strategies could result in more favorable investment performance.

Bruno Paulson
Portfolio Manager
Morgan Stanley IM

Bruno is a portfolio manager for Morgan Stanley Investment Management’s London-based International Equity team. Prior to that, Bruno worked for Sanford Bernstein, where he was a Senior Analyst covering the financial sector for eight years.

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.