The Labor tax "top-up" rule every investor should know
Since Labor announced its capital gains tax reforms, one of the biggest talking points has been the new 30% minimum tax on capital gains from 1 July 2027.
Supporters say it closes a loophole. Critics argue it amounts to a new wealth tax by another name. Whatever your view, the 30% floor has become one of the defining features of the reforms.
But buried deep within the legislation is an obscure provision: the minimum tax gap amount.
While it sounds like something only a tax lawyer could love, it's the mechanism that ensures investors actually pay the new 30% minimum tax.
In simple terms, if your capital gain hasn't effectively been taxed at 30%, the Australian Taxation Office calculates the shortfall and collects the difference through additional income tax.
Importantly, it creates potential unintended consequences for how super contributions and capital gains interact.
To understand exactly how the provision works - and who is most likely to be affected - I spoke with two tax specialists:
- Marguerite Vo, Tax Manager, HLB Mann Judd
- Melody Edwards, Senior Financial Adviser & Aged Care Specialist, Evalesco
Understanding the minimum tax gap amount
The purpose of the minimum tax gap amount is simple: to ensure investors ultimately pay at least the new minimum tax on their real capital gains.
Traditionally, you could blend capital gains with other forms of income that benefited from the tax-free threshold and lower marginal tax rates. That's no longer the case.
As Edwards explains:
"In simple terms, a minimum tax gap amount can arise when you sell an asset, such as direct shares, ETFs, managed funds, an investment property or a holiday home, and make a capital gain while your marginal tax rate is below 30%.
Under the proposed rules, capital gains are effectively subject to a minimum tax rate of 30%. If the tax you would otherwise pay on the gain is less than that amount, an additional 'top-up' tax may apply to bring the total tax paid on the gain up to the minimum rate."
Vo reaches much the same conclusion, adding that the provision is likely to be particularly relevant for self-funded retirees, who often have relatively low levels of labour income.
"Whether a minimum tax gap amount arises is driven by the size of the capital gain relative to an individual's other taxable income in the relevant income year, rather than by an individual's marginal tax rate in isolation," she says.
4 worked examples every investor should understand
In the table below, Vo provides worked examples that illustrate how the provision operates from FY28.
Example 1: Low other income, big tax gap
Sarah has recently retired and earned $10,000 of other taxable income before selling a long-held investment portfolio that she realises for $100,000 in capital gains.
The $10,000 is taxed at the ordinary income rate which is 0%.
"But because the capital gain represents the majority of Sarah’s taxable income for the year, the additional tax generated by the capital gain is less than 30% of the gain," Vo explains.
"As a result, a minimum tax gap amount of $6,748 arises."
Compared to the current rules, Sarah's tax bill increases by around 30%.
Example 2: modest other income, modest tax gap
Michael works part-time and earns $40,000 before realising the same $100,000 capital gain.
"Because Michael already has some employment income, the additional tax generated by the gain is closer to the 30% benchmark. However, it is still below 30%, resulting in a modest minimum tax gap amount of $800," Vo says.
Example 3: large labour income, no tax gap
Emma earns $100,000 from full-time employment before realising the same $100,000 capital gain.
In her case, the additional tax generated by the capital gain already reaches Labor's 30% minimum tax benchmark.
As such, no minimum tax gap amount arises.
Example 4: low total income, huge tax gap
In this example, the taxpayer is a non-working spouse whose only regular taxable income is $10,000 in dividends.
Her partner earns above the income test threshold, meaning the household is not eligible for any prescribed government income support payments that exempt her from the 30% tax.
She then sells part of her share portfolio, realising a $20,000 net capital gain.
"The result is a minimum tax gap amount of $4,348. That's equivalent to 263% of the tax that would otherwise have been payable on her total taxable income," Edwards says.
Why putting more into super could leave you worse off
Many investors' first instinct will be to look for ways to reduce the top-up tax.
One obvious idea is making a tax-deductible super contribution. Unfortunately, Edwards says that strategy won't work.
"A personal concessional (tax-deductible) super contribution will not reduce the tax or minimum tax gap below the 30% rate and in some instances may result in additional tax payable due to the 15% contributions tax and Division 293 tax (where applied) on contributions."
Instead, both her and Vo agree investors will increasingly focus on timing and the use of available capital losses.
"To the extent an individual has flexibility, they may place greater focus on the timing of when a capital gain is realised and less focus on their marginal tax rate," Vo says.
"They may also pay closer attention to whether they fall within one of the exemption categories in the year a capital gain is realised, particularly where their eligibility for certain prescribed government payments may differ from year to year."
Geoff Wilson says the tax hits the wrong people
The worked examples illustrate one of the biggest criticisms of Labor's reforms: that the minimum tax gap amount is more likely to affect investors on lower taxable incomes than those already paying higher marginal tax rates.
Wilson Asset Management founder Geoff Wilson AO has been one of the most vocal critics of the changes, arguing the minimum tax provisions miss their intended target.
"This floor doesn't touch the wealthy. Anyone already paying 37 or 47 cents in the dollar never feels it.
"It lands on the part-time workers, the young investors and the self-funded retirees who did everything right and it strips away the one legitimate tool they had, putting the proceeds into their super, to avoid being taxed at 30% on a modest, once-in-a-lifetime gain.
"That's the opposite of what this government says it's trying to do.
"Every week we seem to discover another provision that wasn't part of the public debate. Australians deserve to know the full consequences of changes this significant before they become law, not months after the legislation has been introduced."

The exemptions
The minimum tax gap amount is contained in the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026.
Under the provisions of the Bill, the minimum tax rules generally do not apply to investors receiving certain government support payments, including:
- Age Pension, Disability Support Pension and Carer Payment under the Social Security Act 1991
- Other social support payments, including Family Tax Benefit and Parental Leave Pay
- Certain payments under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, including the Carer Service Pension and Invalidity Service Pension
- Certain payments under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004
Vo also says broadly, the minimum tax will not apply where:
- there is no minimum tax gap amount
- the taxpayer is not an Australian resident individual
- it’s in relation to: deferred residential and non-residential gains and/or new residential dwellings or affordable housing unless the relevant entity with these asset classes chooses indexation and the minimum tax over applying the CGT discount
- the taxpayer falls within one of the exemption categories (e.g. recipients of certain prescribed government payments).
A fundamental shift in Australia's tax system?
For decades, Australians have generally combined salary, business income, dividends, rental income and capital gains into a single pool of taxable income.
The tax-free threshold, progressive tax rates and various deductions - including eligible superannuation contributions - have then applied to that overall taxable income.
The minimum tax gap amount changes that dynamic. By requiring certain capital gains to be subject to a minimum 30% tax, regardless of an investor's overall taxable income, it creates a separate tax floor for those gains.
Edwards agrees the measure represents a significant departure from the traditional approach, although she cautions against describing it as "reverse progressive".
"It can be said that the intention of the minimum tax rate is to implement a tax floor for capital gains, so 'reverse progressive' is more a description of the practical impact of this measure rather than the policy intent," she says.
She adds that investors on tax rates of 30% or higher are likely to see relatively little impact from the minimum tax, while those on lower marginal tax rates are more likely to be affected.
2 topics
1 contributor mentioned