Tough road ahead for Aussie banks

The banks benefited tremendously from this leveraging cycle. Despite a brief pause during the early 90s recession and GFC, credit growth has easily outpaced growth in GDP, leading to a significant increase in the economy’s debt to GDP ratio. This boom in credit helped the banks make record profits and dividends. Long-term shareholders are pleased. 

But there is reason to believe this structural decline in global interest rates is coming to an end. Linked to the interest rate cycle is the bad and doubtful debt cycle. When interest rates decline, debt servicing costs fall, asset prices rise and the economy generally expands which makes servicing debt easy. We are currently in this phase of the cycle as evidenced by NAB reporting its lowest bad and doubtful debt charge since at least 1980. Although this is great news for shareholders, the obvious question is where to from here? 

My view is that the banks current bad and doubtful debt charge is unsustainably low. As the Aussie housing cycle matures, as the global interest rate cycle begins to normalise and as the fallout from the mining boom spreads through WA and Queensland, bad debts will inevitably rise. 

Also, the Australian bank demerger cycle is well underway following decades of buying out their competitors. Non-core banking operations or capital intensive ones will continue to be sold in the years ahead, such as insurance, leasing, funds and wealth management operations. 

Just to be clear, I am not foreshadowing a recession-like bad and doubtful debt cycle or a sharp correction in the banks. I believe the banks are high-quality institutions by global standards that have been well regulated and have prudent mortgage books. Rather, I expect a period of sub-par earnings growth where the majority of the sector’s return will come from dividends rather than capital appreciation. 

Given this outlook, I would prefer to allocate to the sector from a structurally underweight position. When looking for growth to replace the banks, the ex-30 segment of the market represents a better risk-reward trade-off than the top-30 stocks.

Originally posted on Contango Asset Management website: (VIEW LINK)