The hail storm that hit Sydney late last year made a lot of headlines, but has not changed our fundamental view that insurance is an attractive sector in the current environment. Losses from weather events are part and parcel of running an insurance business. While they introduce profit volatility and can have some flow-on impacts, we believe the major insurers are in a strong position to mitigate and offset these factors.

Sydney hail storm one of the biggest events of the past 30 years

The Insurance Council of Australia’s latest estimate is that this event will cost the insurance industry $673m. Our analysis suggests the cost could eventually reach $1.5-2.0bn once all claims are reported and paid, which would make it one of the top five most expensive weather events of the past 30 years and possibly the most damaging hail storm since the Sydney hail storm in 1999.

Source: Insurance Council of Australia, Firetrail Investments. Notes (1) Red bar indicates Firetrail estimate of ultimate losses from Dec-18 Sydney hail storm. Most recent estimate from Insurance Council of Australia is $673m.

Direct impacts are quantifiable and contained 

With 60-70% combined share of the NSW Motor and Home markets, at face value such an event could be disastrous for IAG’s and Suncorp’s FY19 profits. Both however, have very strong levels of protection which restrict losses and pass the excess on to reinsurers. The net costs of this event are capped at $169m for IAG and $250m for Suncorp, despite the gross cost likely being multiples of this amount.

Both insurers also have allowances in their guidance for a “normal” level of total weather losses in any given year. While the Sydney event does increase the chance that IAG and Suncorp exceed these allowances in FY19, both also have covers in place that provide protection if claims from multiple weather events over a 12-month period begin to add up.

The combination of various reinsurance protections mitigates a substantial proportion of the direct costs of the hail storm. We believe indirect impacts are more relevant for ongoing profitability.

Price lever can be pulled to offset indirect impacts

Apart from the actual claims from large weather events, there are two main flow-on impacts that need to be considered:

Increases in reinsurance costs

The price IAG and Suncorp pay for reinsurance would normally be expected to rise following large claim events, but over the years both have shown a strong ability to negotiate reasonably attractive terms. Most recently, IAG renewed its reinsurance program for 2019 at “relatively flat” rates, despite incurring losses on its 2018 program.

The ability of IAG and Suncorp to obtain favourable terms can be attributed to the significant surplus capacity that exists in global reinsurance markets, IAG’s and Suncorp’s position as two of the largest reinsurance purchasers in the world, and the attractiveness of Australia as a source of diversification for global reinsurers.

Supply chain pressures

The high number of repairs needed in a short space of time after a weather event can place insurer supply chains under strain. Following a hail storm, motor repairer capacity typically becomes stretched and costs are pushed higher. While any claims blow-outs from the hail storm should be covered by reinsurers, it is inflation in the day-to-day claims over the following six months that can put pressure on IAG and Suncorp.

Industry-wide impacts lead to re-pricing 

The indirect impacts from higher reinsurance costs and supply chain inflation tend to affect all insurers, which typically drives a pricing response across the industry (albeit sometimes with a lag). Following a run of large weather events in 2010/11, Home & Contents pricing increased by 10%+ pa for 3-4 years. Given reasonably rational Motor and Home markets currently, we believe there is a case for recent price increases to continue or perhaps accelerate.

Source: Insurance Council of Australia

Shelter from housing and consumer weakness

Stepping back from the noise of weather claims, one storm that insurers are well positioned to navigate is the current weakness in the housing market and Aussie consumer. While affordability pressures can have some impact, demand tends to be reasonably resilient given the nature of insurance products as mitigants of cash flow and asset risk.

Insurers have typically outperformed relative to the ASX200 during more bearish periods for markets and/or the economy. The chart below highlights how IAG and the ASX200 performed through the GFC. While the GFC is an extreme example, it illustrates the value the market places on the defensiveness of insurance in tougher times. We believe this is an attractive feature against the current consumer backdrop.

Source: FactSet, Firetrail Investments


The risk insurers face from large weather events will always be a key talking point for investors, but IAG and Suncorp have shown an ability to successfully mitigate a large portion of the P&L and capital volatility through reinsurance and re-pricing. With defensive characteristics in an increasingly difficult economic environment, we believe domestic insurance represents an attractive sector to be exposed to.

Want to learn more?

For further insights from the team at Firetrail Investments , please visit our website.


Mr T

i have seen a number of articles on livewire recently commenting on insurers being a good bet in the current environment. simplistically, insurers make money from policy revenue> payouts and operating costs, but also from investing the premiums and earning a return on this. 2 comments therefore: 1. improvements in the 'combined ratio' (ie how good the insurer is at insuring) are typically vastly outweighed by worsening of investment performance when markets go down. i would certainly hypothesise at the moment that the downside of investment risk outweighs the upside of profit improvements from an improving CR. 2. when the world trade centre went down, i was involved with looking at every insurer in australia to see which would survive and which wouldnt. the main outcome of this bit of work was that insurer's publicly available accounts are so opaque that they are essentially useless. punters (and in fact auditors and insurance industry professionals) cannot tell what is on/off balance sheet, what the re-insurance arrangements are (or even who they are with!), what investments are being held etc etc. investing in insurers therefore has extremely high 'information risk' and makes them very high risk investments.

Blake Henricks

Thanks Mr T. Insurance is an inherently volatile business with reasonably opaque disclosures. However, these characteristics are already reflected in the valuations of stocks like IAG and SUN, which is one of the reasons why they don’t trade at similar multiples to other oligopolistic industries like supermarkets. Our current view is that when comparing the insurance sector to the ASX200, we believe it is in a relatively more attractive position than it has been historically given a stronger revenue and earnings growth outlook than many other sectors in the market. It is true that we will see some mark-to-market investment losses on the equity and corporate bond portfolios of IAG and SUN at the upcoming results. However the ongoing profitability of the insurance business is to a large extent protected by the fact that both insurers match the duration of their bond portfolios to the duration of their claims liabilities, so that interest rate movements have similar impacts on both sides of the balance sheet. Management disclosures on investment portfolios have also improved markedly over the past decade so we at least have some information on the split of investments across asset classes and credit rating bands.