Why the "flight to quality" is a crowded (and often confused) investment

Plus, we take a closer look at what office occupiers are now looking for in the post-COVID world.
Hans Lee

Livewire Markets

As any good bargain hunter (or shrewd investor) will tell you, quality can but does not always immediately command a premium price. 

In the equities arena, some stocks are considered to have high-quality earnings and top-quality management teams but do not possess expensive valuations. In fixed income, we often think of investment-grade companies having debt that costs more to buy, to begin with, because analysts perceive these businesses have far lower default risk. 

The same applies to commercial property. In the last two years, commercial property asset valuations have re-rated dramatically - especially in lower-grade or less premium office offerings where the death of the office has been sounded time and time again. 

But, as Colin Mackay of Cromwell Property Group would tell you, premium properties and premium valuations don't always go together. 

"I think if you conflate luxury or price with quality, then you're actually ignoring the needs of most occupiers in the market. Most occupiers are after a Toyota, not a Rolls Royce," he said.

So what does this analogy mean and how is it shaping the landscape for property investors? Find out in this episode of The Pitch.

EDITED TRANSCRIPT

Hans Lee: Firstly, how do you define the "flight to quality"? Secondly, how is Cromwell thinking about it?

Colin Mackay: The flight to quality has certainly been a popular phrase this year but we think it's been misconstrued as a flight to premium. We actually looked at the data and the premium segment of the market has actually seen the biggest increase in its vacancy rate since the pandemic began. We do agree that a flight to quality is occurring, but it's occurring across all grades of office, and not just the top end of town.

And I think if you conflate luxury or price with quality, you're ignoring the needs of most occupiers in the market. That's because most occupiers are after a Toyota. They're not after a Rolls Royce. What they're after is the best quality space in the best location but within their budget.

Lee: What are the types of things occupiers are now looking for?

Mackay: Some requirements stay the same. I think they'll stay the same, no matter how space usage evolves. That's things like the availability of natural light, accessibility to transport, and proximity to amenities. They'll stand the test of time.

We have seen other requirements become less important. A big one historically has been floor plate size. You had to have a certain size floor plate to be considered a premium asset. Otherwise, you were a lower grade. 

But as the purpose of office has shifted more towards collaboration and incidental social interaction, having that smaller footplate isn't necessarily a bad thing. And certainly, bigger isn't necessarily better in the eyes of occupiers.

Lee: Why are occupiers looking for these types of things? How have you been identifying the trend?

Mackay: I think they've really re-evaluated the purpose of the office and what they want to use that space for. So, with work-from-home being more prevalent, the purpose of the office has shifted much more towards collaboration, incidental interaction, and developing and building culture in the workplace. 

Maybe you don't need to house all your employees on one level. You may have three levels but across a smaller footprint, there is a better buzz about the office. But as I said, some of those things are linked to human nature. We all want natural sunlight. 

But on that point, with the use of space evolving, we are seeing greater demand for things like embedded technology. We need more technology in the space so that you can facilitate that flexible way of working. We're also seeing things like a greater diversity of spaces. Being able to facilitate focused work as well as collaborative work. It's constantly evolving.

Lee: What about ESG credentials, where do they sit in the pecking order and are they growing in prominence?

Mackay: ESG continues to rise in prominence. We're seeing it become more important across a range of stakeholders like investors, occupiers, and regulators. At the moment, the focus is on operational efficiency - water, waste, and energy consumption.

But we think, as the grid decarbonises over time, what we're going to see is more of a focus on embodied carbon emissions. What that means is the emissions produced when you're producing concrete and when you're actually building the buildings rather than running the lights. And that's something that is already a focus in Europe, particularly the Nordic countries which already have a renewable grid. Denmark, for example, has a cap on the embodied carbon emissions that a new development can produce.

So, I think as that becomes more of a focus here in Australia, we'll actually see the repurposing and revitalisation of existing assets viewed more favourably, and maybe be the greener option than building a new shiny building, for example.

Lee: How is this manifesting in terms of the opportunities you pursue - can you provide an example?

Mackay: We continue to view A-grade space quite favourably. It's a bit cheaper than premium, so it appeals to a broader pool of occupiers. But you still typically get that really good access to transport, proximity to amenities, high-quality space, natural light, and things like that.

We're probably avoiding large floor-plate assets, so more from a physical structural layout perspective. That's because those assets tend not to cater towards smaller occupiers as well as a smaller floor-plate office might. And that smaller occupier segment of the market is actually one where we see quite a bit of demand growth.


Invest in real

We provide investors with access to a range of quality, income-producing property investment options. Find out more.

Managed Fund
Cromwell Direct Property Fund
Australian Property
........
Livewire gives readers access to information and educational content provided by financial services professionals and companies (“Livewire Contributors”). Livewire does not operate under an Australian financial services licence and relies on the exemption available under section 911A(2)(eb) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in respect of any advice given. Any advice on this site is general in nature and does not take into consideration your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before making a decision please consider these and any relevant Product Disclosure Statement. Livewire has commercial relationships with some Livewire Contributors.

1 fund mentioned

1 contributor mentioned

Hans Lee
Senior Editor
Livewire Markets

Hans leads the team's coverage of the global economy and fixed income. He is the creator and moderator of Signal or Noise, Livewire's multimedia series dedicated to top-down investing.

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.

Comments

Sign In or Join Free to comment