A generational opportunity to reduce risk and enhance income
The data and artificial intelligence (“AI”) revolution, the internet-of-things, smart cities, booming power demand; the way we live has changed, creating a “New Economy” in the process. The infrastructure that supports and connects it all is now garnering the recognition it deserves.
Pair these long-term secular tailwinds with a growing portion of funding for infrastructure supplied by private capital, and we uncover what may be a generational opportunity for investors. We explored this in a previous interview with Steven Porto, Partner in Ares Infrastructure Opportunities and Co-CEO of the Ares Core Infrastructure Fund. But what purpose does it serve in an asset allocation, and more importantly, how can you thoughtfully gain exposure to this asset class in your portfolio? In this article of Private Market Insights, we address those questions.
First, we like to set the stage with common characteristics of private infrastructure:
- Essential assets: Infrastructure assets provide services that are critical to society (e.g., generating electricity).
- Defensive cash flows: Infrastructure assets benefit from long-term contracts that can provide stable revenue streams.
- High barriers to entry: Infrastructure projects typically are capital-intensive, time-consuming commitments, which creates the opportunity for significant incumbency moats.
We find that investors like the portfolio enhancing potential of private infrastructure for three key reasons:
- Strong risk-adjusted return potential
- Diversified sources of total returns
- Relative stability during market and economic stress
Packaging these reasons into an asset class in need of immense investment is powerful. Let’s uncover the opportunity.
How private infrastructure can empower a portfolio
1. History of strong risk-adjusted returns
Over the past 20 years, private infrastructure has delivered a ~9% annualized return, outpacing global equities and its listed counterparts. What investors particularly appreciate is the historical consistency of those returns. Private infrastructure has exhibited equity-like returns with closer to bond-like volatility and thus has occupied a favorable position on the risk-return spectrum.
Historical risk and return(1)
All data quarterly. Above represents 20 years of growth from the period Jun 2004 – Jun 2024. Private infrastructure represented by Burgiss All Infrastructure Index. Public equity represented by MSCI World Index. REITs represented by FTSE-NAREIT All Equity REIT Index. Public listed infrastructure represented by S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Agg bonds represented by Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. High yield represented by Bloomberg Global High Yield Bond Index. Past performance is not an indicator of future returns.
2. Diversification
Perhaps as one of its most appealing qualities, private infrastructure has low-to-moderate correlation to many traditional asset classes. More importantly, it represents access to a different set of assets that have unique return profiles—something we believe investors are seeking now more than ever.
3. Relative stability during market stress
Not only has private infrastructure historically been somewhat sheltered from public market downturns (evidenced by fewer and shallower drawdowns), but it has also acted as a hedge against inflation and GDP contraction. Even during recessions and inflation regimes, essential hard assets continue to be indispensable.
All data quarterly. Above represents the 20-year period from Jun 2004 – Jun 2024. Same indices as above. High inflation determined by the 80th percentile of CPI over the same period. Normal inflation determined by periods when CPI was less than the 80th percentile. Past performance is not an indicator of future returns.
Putting private infrastructure to work in your portfolio
We believe investors have historically been under allocated to infrastructure relative to traditional asset classes, largely because “public” or “listed” infrastructure has been the primary access point for the wealth channel. Generally, owning listed infrastructure has meant owning heavier, dirtier and older infrastructure or the individual companies that own and operate these assets. For those reasons, public infrastructure has been more similar to lower-beta, lower-return public equities. As a result, many investors today have minimal exposure to the asset class generally through investments that mirror broad market indices.
We believe private infrastructure allows investors to get exposure to the buildout of the “New Economy”—power (e.g., natural gas, nuclear, renewables, battery storage), mobility, digital (e.g., fiber, cell towers, data centers)—a more contemporary investment thesis for infrastructure.
As investors begin to think about adding private infrastructure to their portfolios, a starting point is often core infrastructure. Core sits on the low end of the equity risk-return spectrum for private infrastructure and can see half or more of its return in the form of income. Importantly, core equity represents long-lived, fully constructed, contracted and cash-flowing infrastructure assets. With this in mind, we see the potential for private infrastructure to meet a number of our clients’ objectives—namely boosting total portfolio yield and diversification in the wake of falling yields and rising correlations.
Like other asset classes, the funding source for private infrastructure should be dictated by the needs and goals of the portfolio. For this, we typically look at three scenarios—each with a different end goal in mind:
Illustrative examples of enhancing a 60/40 with a 20% private infrastructure allocation(5)
A. Goal: Reduce total portfolio risk and increase yield
- Funding source: Public equity
- Return: +30bps
- Volatility: -200bps
- Sharpe: ~27% better
- Yield: 3.3%
What we have found to be the most common route is funding a private infrastructure allocation from public equity. Because of its historically equity-like returns, more bond-like volatility and low correlation, many investors appreciate the ability to alleviate overconcentration in public equities without necessarily sacrificing return. Based on the model above, through diversification, this option shifts the portfolio sharply to the left, reducing volatility by ~200 bps and increasing yield by ~60 bps.
For the more growth-minded investors with less of a need for immediate income, core infrastructure equity can still be a powerful solution when the cash flow is reinvested and compounded over time. But for those in search of greater potential for capital appreciation, value-add and opportunistic or developmental infrastructure equity can potentially provide a more private equity-like risk/return profile.
B. Goal: Increase total portfolio return and maintain total yield
- Funding source: Public fixed income
- Return: +120bps
- Volatility: +40bps
- Sharpe: ~17% better
- Yield: 2.7%
Another option is to fund a private infrastructure allocation from the fixed income portion of the portfolio. We have generally found these investors to be willing to take on more downside risk in their pursuit of higher returns. While private infrastructure has half the volatility and drawdowns of public equities, funding infrastructure equity from core fixed income may come with some degree of excess risk.
For other investors, overconcentration in corporate fixed income can be a motivator to add a differentiated source of income to the portfolio. This option moves the portfolio materially higher on the return spectrum, achieving ~120 bps in excess return without giving up yield.
Alternatively, for the more income-oriented investor, infrastructure debt can potentially be a source of premium yield with more bond-like downside risk.
C. Goal: A little of both!
- Funding source: Public equity and fixed income
- Return: +70bps
- Volatility: -100bps
- Sharpe: ~22% better
- Yield: 3.0%
Finally, we show an equal part debt/equity funding option that may appeal to investors seeking a combination of higher returns and lower volatility. We see this as a reasonable way to work private infrastructure into the portfolio as the asset class blends equity ownership with an income-driven return stream. And, similar to the preceding two options, replacing core equity and fixed income with a higher-yielding asset class may help to bolster the portfolio’s income-producing power. In this option, returns improved by ~70 bps with a strong ~100 bp reduction in volatility and an increase in yield.
Conclusion
As awareness and demand for the asset class continues to expand, we believe private infrastructure will become a meaningful part of individual allocations. However, we recognize the importance of being thoughtful in how you incorporate private infrastructure alongside the rest of the portfolio. We are convinced that private infrastructure is worth considering as its own asset class with unique characteristics, and that it is truly doing something different in the portfolio.
For more on how to think about private infrastructure in the context of a diversified portfolio, view our piece below.

1 topic
Mr. Benveniste is the Head of Australia for Ares Asia Wealth Management Solutions and acts as a client portfolio manager for Australian investors. Prior to joining Ares Australia Management in January 2020, Mr Benveniste spent six and a half...
Mr. Benveniste is the Head of Australia for Ares Asia Wealth Management Solutions and acts as a client portfolio manager for Australian investors. Prior to joining Ares Australia Management in January 2020, Mr Benveniste spent six and a half...