Austal dips 10% but surging defence spending makes this pullback look like an opportunity
Austal (ASX: ASB) is facing its steepest and most prolonged drawdown in recent years, dipping 10% today and 35% off its mid-January all-time high. This follows a formidable two-year run up, where it ran from $1.9 to a peak of $8.82.
Today's first-half result reads well at face value, with double digit growth across the board, backed by margin expansion and a solid cash position.
Two weeks ago, Austal disclosed a ~$17.1 million accounting error tied to its T-ATS program incentives that had been baked into its FY26 EBIT guidance. This drove a sharp 22.8% selloff on the day (13-Feb).
Despite the recent weakness, Austal remains one of few ASX-listed companies that has exposure to the rising global defence spending thematic, including material US exposure (approximately 75% of FY25 revenue). With an order book that's grown almost five-fold since FY23 and substantially more earnings growth ahead, IML's Lucas Goode says this pullback looks like an attractive entry point.
1H26 at a glance
- Revenue up 34.4% to $1.1 billion
- EBIT up 41.3% to $60.3 million
- EBIT margins up 20 bps to 5.4%
- Net profit after tax up 21.4% to $30.5 million
- Net cash position of $241.4 million
- No interim dividend reflecting focus on capex program to rapidly increase shipbuilding capacity
- Order book of $17.7 billion at 20-Feb-26 vs. $13.1 billion at 30-Jun-25 (up 35.1% in eight months)
- "Remains well positioned to add further defence project opportunities in the USA, as well as in Australia through Strategic Shipbuilding Agreement (SSA)."
Do you currently hold the stock and what is your rating?
What matters from the results?
Austal is on track to deliver over $3.5bn of revenue by FY30 with a target shipbuilding EBIT margin of 7-10% as stated on today's call. The resulting earnings should thus dwarf the revised FY26 EBIT guidance of $110m.
How do those outcomes affect the outlook?
What should investors be paying attention to as the story unfolds?
A good analyst knows where their blind spots are: What could you be wrong about?
3 topics
1 stock mentioned
1 contributor mentioned