The notion of global investing is not what it used to be just 10 years ago. Rapid advancements in technology, free trade agreements and the rise of multinationals in emerging markets has transformed the structure of the economic world today, allowing companies to compete for customers, labor and capital on a global basis. These profound shifts have changed the way to think about global investing, not only in terms of opportunities but also portfolio allocation decisions.
Rather than dividing portfolios in regional slices, my colleague, Jody Jonsson, believes global flexibility is crucial to designing a “future-proof” portfolio amid the changing dynamics of business and trade. Jody has 29 years of investment experience, 27 with Capital. She has covered industries such as insurance and household products. She holds an MBA from Stanford Graduate School of Business.
Welcome to the New Geography
Globalization and an increase in open trade is having a significant impact on the universe of investment opportunities, meaning that companies headquartered in Europe, Japan and the U.S. don’t necessarily generate most of their revenue in their home country like they once used to.
Furthermore, the rise of economies in China, India and other emerging markets is having a profound effect on the global economy and major implications for companies in the developed world.
For instance, a review of S&P 500 company revenues shows that about 37.5% is derived from outside the U.S. Meanwhile, the 10 largest companies in the MSCI Europe Index get approximately 70% of revenues from outside Europe, in part due to slower growth in their region and better opportunities abroad.
So when considering how much of your portfolio is exposed to the global economy, I’ve found that digging into where a company generates its revenue is a much more practical and transparent yardstick, rather than relying on an index structured around domicile or country.
Investing in Europe Means Investing Globally
Revenue exposure of top 10 companies in the MSCI Europe Index
Revenue exposure of the top 10 companies in the MSCI Europe Index by market cap, as at 31 December 2017. Sources: MSCI, RIMES
As a bottom-up investor, I use this approach to broaden the opportunity set of investment choices. It gives me the flexibility to look across a global industry and select the companies that I believe are best positioned for growth, regardless of their location.
From Goods to Gigabytes
Investors often used to think of multinational companies as powerhouses in commodities or heavy industries, but a host of new global companies is rapidly emerging. If the 20th century was defined by a phenomenal rise in the transfer of goods and industrial commodities, the 21st century is being characterized by the rapid digitization of services and the increasing automation of manufacturing.
The knowledge economy, or digital trade, is gaining momentum, and this is giving rise to a new breed of global giants that are “idea” companies — think Amazon or Alphabet (Google’s parent). These companies are creative, nimble and networked, leveraging technology to their advantage.
‘Idea-driven’ firms could provide opportunities
Creative, nimble and networked, they leverage technology to their advantage Top 10 largest companies in the MSCI ACWI1 by market capitalisation
The top 10 companies for 1997 and 2007 are as at 31 December for each year. Sources: MSCI, RIMES
With the Internet, there are no real borders, which creates paradigm shifts in the way companies are organized and in how products are consumed. Product adoption can be swift and distribution costs limited — the smartphone or tablet is the delivery mechanism.
It’s no wonder that the composition of the world’s most valuable companies by market value has changed dramatically since 2007, with tech-related firms dominating the index rather than old-line behemoths in the oil, finance and industrials sectors.
Globalization Is Here to Stay
As borders blur, the flexibility to invest in companies anywhere in the world has become important as investors seek to benefit from globalization. The growth of the FTSE Multinationals Index is a reflection of the rise in global commerce since the 1990s. Index members, which must derive more than 30% of their revenue from outside their domestic region, has expanded to 735 from 427 in 1994.
Despite recent protectionist rhetoric, most notably in the risk taking between the US and China on trade agreements, it’s hard to see globalization reversing: It’s embedded in the way many companies do business, supply chains are set up and products are manufactured. Apple is an obvious example: Its supply chain spans 30 countries, and it is a master of using geography to its advantage, sourcing suppliers that can churn out cost-effective parts that adhere to its quality requirements.
Moreover, many established multinationals like Unilever, Nestlé and Coca-Cola have been moving closer to end-markets over the years. They have decentralized their operations to be much more local to gain a deeper understanding of local markets and compete with a rising number of domestic companies.
Global Companies Scour the World for Customers
Where a company does business can be more important than where it’s located
2017 revenues shown for all companies. Numbers may not add to 100% due to rounding. Sources: Capital Group, company reports
Moving forward, we are likely to see global trade patterns evolve with the increasing digitization of commerce and the likelihood of new trade, tariff and tax structures in many parts of the world.
Of course, not all global companies will thrive in this environment. Fundamental research will be key to identifying potential winners.
Having invested in global companies for nearly three decades, I have found that successful multinational companies typically have innovative management teams, diverse sources of revenue and resilient balance sheets. These are the attributes I will be looking for as globalization enters a new era.
This communication is strictly for the confidential use of the recipient, solely for the purpose for which it is provided, and may not be disclosed or circulated to, or relied upon by third parties. Past results are not predictive of future results.
This information is neither an offer nor a solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to provide any investment service. Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and may not necessarily reflect the view of Capital Group or its affiliates. While Capital Group uses reasonable efforts to obtain information from sources which it believes to be reliable, Capital Group makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information. The information provided in this communication is of a general nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on any of the information you should consider its appropriateness, having regard to your own objectives, financial situation and needs.
This communication has been prepared by Capital International, Inc., a member of Capital Group, a company incorporated in California, United States of America. The liability of members is limited.
In Australia, this communication is issued by Capital Group Investment Management Limited (ACN 164 174 501 AFSL No. 443 118), a member of Capital Group, located at Level 18, 56 Pitt Street, Sydney NSW 2000 Australia.
All Capital Group trademarks are owned by The Capital Group Companies, Inc. or an affiliated company in the US, Australia and other countries. All other company and product names mentioned are the trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.
* As at 31 December 2017. Source: Capital Group. This paper is an update to that published in October 2017.
© 2018 Capital Group. All rights reserved. CR-321846 ASIAxJ