Marcus Padley

Here’s something to send to your kids. It appears to be irritating to younger investors that seemingly less gifted people than themselves fluked 40 golden years of extraordinary property and stockmarket appreciation. Golden years that, since the global financial crisis, are by no means guaranteed to repeat. The younger generation might never enjoy the 40-year golden period that came to an end with the GFC.

The older generation, like myself, took out a mortgage the moment they could afford to. The advice at the time from our parents’ generation was to get on the first rung of the property market as soon as possible.

Of course, this was 1982, ten years into the credit boom, or more accurately, the “debt boom” that started somewhere in the early 1970s. The availability of debt has not been eternal. In those days you had to suck up to the banks, wear a suit to the interview, and promise them that your parents would repay every dollar if you didn’t. Only then would they begrudgingly open their wallets.

At the time, I was working for an investment bank in the UK, which, unprovoked by me or any other employees, suddenly offered us all flash company cars on a salary-sacrifice basis, and three times our salaries in mortgage loans at a discounted interest rate with fast-tracked approval.

We all suddenly went from poor renters in the scruffy outer suburbs of London driving beaten-up Mark III Cortinas to property-owning yuppies driving new Golf GTIs and living in Chelsea. I have been living with debt ever since.

But it has paid off enormously. Since 1974 the property market, if you believe the numbers, has possibly returned about 10 per cent a year. A 10 per cent return over 36 years, compounded, will turn $100,000 into $3,090,000. If you had bought a house in Australia in 1974 for $100,000, then that equation is probably about right. The bloke that lives over the back of my fence did a bit better; he bought two blocks for £450 a bit earlier than 1974. Inflation has paid off that mortgage.

Of course, some Australians got on the property ladder a little bit later than 1974, and you can now generally measure the wealth of an Australian by their age, which dictates when they started to take responsibility for themselves and consequently bought a house. They are now sitting on a handsome asset, and while it may appear effortless to the new generations, there is a lesson for younger people in their success.

The reason the Australian property buyer has made money stems not from the property market itself, although that has helped enormously, but from the enforced attitude to debt that comes with a large debt.

Property has forced property owners to be disciplined, to pay off capital, to control their spending, but most importantly, to get out of bed in the mornings with purpose. A mortgage, school fees, and not enough super (since super only started in 1991) are tremendous motivators. In fact, there is an argument, as evidenced by the miserable state of some of the very wealthy, that the more liabilities you have, including mortgages, debt, family dependents and particularly kids, the more you get out of life because the more you are driven to succeed through effort.

Now translate this to a generation that hasn’t fluked the property boom, and doesn’t have enough capital to exploit the synchronous stockmarket boom, and you have a conundrum. Do they now borrow a million dollars and get their foot on the first rung of the property market, or do they embark on aggressive stockmarket speculation in order to even things up between themselves and the lucky generations that went before them?

My suggestion is this: neither. Your best investment in your early 20s is not property or stockmarket speculation, your best investment is in your brain, your career, and, if you are half smart, the business you build that into.

As any business owner will tell you, or as Robert Kiyosaki’s book Rich Dad Poor Dad will confirm, real capital is created by building assets, your own assets.

Plan on that, because there’s a little-known fact about the stockmarket you won’t get told: the stockmarket is there to invest money you’ve made, not make money you haven’t.

Go and make some money first, come back to the stockmarket later. There’s nothing for nothing here.


Please sign in to comment on this wire.

Dom D'Adamo

Brilliant article Marcus, as a man who sits within this generation at 27yrs old it is great to see articles like this providing myself and others with sound advice that if applied will steer us in the right direction. Cheers!

Glenn stanley

Could not agree more. I read 'Making Money Made Simple' when I was 30 (after I finished my PhD in science) which was 10 years late (and Noel had the same message) and all my friends were already married (remember the skyhooks song), in the housing market and had built up super. However, it was worth the effort as I have had amazing jobs since and followed my dreams to make a difference.

Jack Upton

But the education system is trying its hardest to work against what Marcus is suggesting. They are teaching the kids that you are a winner even when you come last! There is only one winner and everyone else comes last. Unless you try to be that winner then you will always come last. As Marcus is putting forward - it is your attitude that will make you a winner. Luck is the cream on the top.

Mr T

i'd offer a counterpoint to this - i think there is merit to active involvement in the stockmarket at a young age actually. and hopefully making some mistakes then. It is far better to make mistakes and learn with a few thousand bucks rather than with millions (with limited time to recover). that said - totally agree otherwise with everything else marcus says. just wonder if a slightly more nuanced view is that young adults would follow marcus' advice AND actively have a 'play' in the stockmarket?

Robert Goodwin

You must be talking about Sydney house prices Marcus. In Adelaide in 1973 you could buy a 3br brick house 15 kms from Adelaide CBD for under $15000 which is what we did.

Peter Brown

Jack Upton. I have worked in the education field teaching children for over 30 years. I have never, and nor have any of my colleagues to my knowledge ever, taught our students that you are a winner when you come last. We have many competitive events and tasks at school where it is quite clear there is one winner. We have competitive NAPLAN tests where children receive grades based on their scores on these national tests. Some students receive A grades, others, B, C and D grades. We encourage our students to do their best (having a go and showing excellence) but we also teach them about resilience and making mistakes, that is, coping with setbacks and not winning.