This ASX fundie is on a forward PE of 11 with a monster 11-12% dividend yield, says Macquarie

You don't often see huge yields on asset managers that are highly rated by the market. So what's going on?
Tom Richardson

Livewire Markets

Bargain hunters wanting monster dividends could nibble on an ASX equities manager that Macquarie reckons boasts a jaw-dropping forward yield near 12% and cheap valuation.

This is no penny stock rollercoaster either, it's actually a blue-chip asset manager, and if you trouser a stock on this kind of yield, you don't need much capital growth to earn big returns. 

The ASX often throws up bargains on huge yields, but is this one or a dividend trap?
The ASX often throws up bargains on huge yields, but is this one or a dividend trap?

The business is Florida-headquartered, but ASX-listed asset manager GQG Partners (ASX: GQG). 

Shares tumbled 9.6% last Friday, after it shocked the market by revealing it wore net outflows of $US1.4 billion in July, including $US1 billion attributable to a single institutional client. 

As at July 31 GQG had $US166.6 billion in funds under management (FUM), versus $US172.4 billion as at June 30. 

The difference between the net outflows and July's total FUM fall is negative market movements as the group said its defensive positioning extended some underperformance versus global indices over 2025. 

11.4% yield based on FY 2026's forecasts

Macquarie reckons it will pay dividends per share of 15.5 cents on adjusted earnings of 16.7 cents in financial 2026, to put the stock on a yield of 11.4% based on Monday's price of $1.77 per share. 

"We lower our valuation to be the mid-point of P/E range of 10-11x (previously 10-12x) to reflect outflow risk," Macquarie told investors on the valuation on Friday. 

This does look tempting and fortunately fund managers are simple beasts to understand when it comes to what drives profits and dividends.

The first point to note is that if global shares stay strong through 2026 it'll be a tailwind for GQG Partners, although if shares fall this stock might be a money-losing bet today.

That key risk is largely in the hands of the gods, but the other is GQG's own investment performance and what its clients decide about it. 

From the penthouse to the doghouse

Fund managers can easily go from the penthouse to the doghouse with investors.

As we've seen with the likes of Magellan Financial (ASX: MFG), Platinum Asset Management (ASX: PTM), Perpetual (ASX: PPT) and Pendal Group (ASX: PDL) buying the dip can be a capital killing strategy in this space. 

And this also likely explains why GQG Partners trades on a cheap valuation, as jumpy investors want a big margin of safety in case its run of underperformance and net outflows extends. 

Cheap or dividend trap?

The key for anyone likely to be tempted by a dividend yield between 10% and 12% is to work out whether July's outflows are a sign of more trouble, or just part of the usual short-term cycles at asset managers. 

I've worked at a mid-sized equities and bond manager myself and it's interesting how advisers and institutions tend to move in herds in deciding whether to redeem funds, even if it makes little sense. 

Sometimes redemptions can be justified, for example if a chief investment officer and co-founder disappears on a European summer jaunt for months while performance bombs. 

Or more commonly, due to outflows materialising due to an extended period of investment underperformance, which means it is hard for large pension funds or advisers to justify to themselves that they should keep the money with a manager. 

At other times, investors pull money as part of run of the mill asset allocation shifts that can affect any fund manager, any time. 

Most large asset allocators such as pension funds will instinctively look to a five-year performance track record to decide whether a fund manager is a good investor through cycles before they hand over funds. 

However, once invested it may only take a year or two of underperformance for cold feet to set in.

GQG Partners flagship GQG Partners Global Equity Fund has returned 14.16% net of fees over the past five years net of fees, versus 14.74% for its global equity benchmark. Its latest Global Value Fund only has a 1-year track record and is small, but is significantly behind its benchmark. 

"As GQG maintains defensive positioning across all strategies, continued underperformance could potentially be a headwind for future net flows," Macquarie told investors. 

As such you could conclude GQG's middling performance isn't a problem as yet, but if it extends or worsens it would be a fair bet that it'll be tough for it to keep client money.

On the other hand, if investment performance improves the inflows and good times could roll to mean the stock is likely very cheap.

Verdict

So I'm on the fence about this one, although my inclination is to think the odds are in your favour that you could make good money here and the huge dividends sure are a pull. 

Macquarie certainly thinks so and values the stock at $2.60, versus the $1.77 it fetched on Monday afternoon. 

That monster yield is also likely to be within reach, assuming markets and GQG don't take a turn for the worse. 

By way of more background, the general direction of the group's FUM growth is still positive, with net inflows totalling $US6.7 billion in 2025 and total FUM still roughly doubling in three years from the $US86.7 billion it boasted as at June 30, 2022.

In part, this is because it has offered competitive fees as an active manager and had a reputation for strong performance when it listed towards the top of 2021's bull market in October of that year.

This shows that the medium-term growth trajectory of GQG Partners has been strong and based largely on decent investment performance supported by a near three-year bull market in global equities since towards the end of 2022. 

........
Please note Tom Richardson may have a financial interest in bitcoin and any other security mentioned in this wire.

5 stocks mentioned

Tom Richardson
Journalist, senior editor
Livewire Markets

Tom covered markets as a Markets Reporter & Commentator at the Australian Financial Review for nearly five years. Prior to that he was the Managing Editor of The Motley Fool Australia leading a team of around 20 investment writers during a...

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.

Comments

Sign In or Join Free to comment