Time for the Fed to act

The equity market is more excited about lower short-term rates and bond yields than a weakening jobs market.
Chris Iggo

AXA Investment Managers

Weak US employment data has fuelled expectations that the Federal Reserve will cut rates by 1.5 percentage points (ppt) over the next year.

That would be aggressive, and consistent with a much weaker economy. Soft jobs data could be the harbinger. So, either bond markets or equities are wrong. If bonds are right, the economy is losing speed and that should ultimately hit risk assets. If stocks are right, lower interest rates will sustain growth and earnings, and bond yields will need to go back up again. It is all to play for in the markets.

  • I still like UK gilts versus Treasuries, and the euro vs. dollar with the European Central Bank now on hold
  • I am concerned about the potential for a risk-off period in the fourth quarter (Q4)

US rate cutting to resume

A 25-basis-point (bp) cut in the Fed Funds Rate on 17 September now looks certain. Market expectations are driven by evidence of a marked weakening in US employment over recent months. The unemployment rate is just up 0.3ppt this year and only 0.9ppt above its cyclical low, and the Sahm Rule – a recession indicator – has not been triggered, but other jobs data does suggest a downshift in demand. Benchmark revisions to estimates of total non-farm payroll jobs suggest 911,000 fewer jobs as of March 2025. More recent data shows stalling job creation, with only 107,000 created since April. In addition, weekly data on unemployment insurance claims jumped 263,000 in the week of 6 September, the biggest increase for four years. It could well be that the jobs data suggests a recession is potentially around the corner.

Labour weakness key

Historically, rate cuts have come in response to weak labour market data. This could be the case again, even with inflation still above target. Consumer prices rose by 0.4% in August, nudging the annual rate to 2.9%. It is likely to breach 3.0% next month, as the core measure already has. While evidence of tariffs causing higher prices for consumers is still not that clear in the official data, it is not absent. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) has risen by 1.0% in the last four months compared to 0.7% in the first four months of 2025. In the same period to August 2024, CPI was up just 0.3%. There is still plenty of room for the new tariff regime to be reflected in the inflation data. The Fed cutting as inflation is rising will not be a good optic, but fears of a recession are still likely to be more important in driving the bond market. Indeed, concerns about growth over the coming quarters should give the Fed confidence in its forecast that inflation, related to tariffs, will be temporary. There are almost three quarter-point rate cuts priced in for the rest of the year, with a further three priced for 2026. At the time of writing, the 10-year Treasury yield had fallen through the 4.0% mark.

But cuts drive positive momentum

The equity market is more excited about lower short-term rates and bond yields than a weakening jobs market. It seems that only evidence of a broader growth slowdown hitting corporate profitability would be needed to stop the stock market rally – the possibility of the S&P 500 index reaching the 7,000 mark is being openly discussed in Bloomberg and CNBC studios. The consensus view on earnings remains positive. For the S&P 500, earnings-per-share is expected to grow by more than 12% over the next year, and the balance of forecast revisions is still positive. Only the consumer staples, energy and utilities sectors are estimated to have earnings growth below 10%. Profit margins have remained strong, with the information technology sector consistently posting margins above 20%.

Margins remain solid

It is hard to understand where tariffs might be hurting the US economy. The rise in consumer prices is modest. The federal government is taking in tariff revenue. So, someone is paying - and it must be, mostly, corporate America. This may show up in lower profits at some point. There were modest dips in margins for consumer staples and materials in Q2, which could be tariff related. Revenue growth has started to weaken; Q2 saw revenue declines for consumer discretionary and staples, industrials and financials. But health, materials and technology firms saw big increases. These are the numbers to watch closely because if revenue starts to slide and margins come under pressure, earnings growth will be hard to sustain.

Turkeys, Christmas and all that…

The prospect of Fed easing is driving valuations. The US equity market is at a record high and its 12-month forward price-earnings ratio is 22 times. Bond yields are moving down in the US, with curve steepening halted for the time being – the benchmark 30-year Treasury bond yield is 40bp lower than where it peaked this year in May. Credit spreads remain tight, and the credit default swap crossover index in Europe is at its lower level since the beginning of 2022. Arguably the US macroeconomic backdrop has worsened – lower growth and higher inflation – and the policy backdrop has remained murky (questions over the independence of the Fed). It is hard to argue that investors should be committing more capital to the US market. But risk-on momentum remains strong.

If the market is right on the Fed, then it could be pricing in a recession. The chart below shows nine-month changes in the Fed Funds Rate.. If the Fed genuinely responds to weaker jobs growth and stable inflation, then equities and bond yields should move lower. If the Fed is forced into easing and inflation moves higher, more curve steepness and a weaker dollar is likely to be the outcome.

Glittering prize

Finally, the dollar price of gold hit a new high last week. Its price appreciation during 2025 has beaten most stock markets. It has significantly outpaced US inflation since the pandemic, save for a brief period when the Fed was tightening. Indeed, this century, gold’s real price in US dollar terms has risen over 500%. Concerns about inflation, debt debasement and the fragility of the fiat currency system are reasons cited to explain the massive rise in its price. What I do not think, is that it reflects a shift away from US dollar assets. Central banks hold gold, but in nominal terms it only accounts for around 15% of total reserve assets. Today, physical gold holdings at central banks, according to International Monetary Fund data, stand at roughly the same level they were at in the early 1970s. Some investors might prefer gold to Treasury securities or money, but the world’s official reserve system is not shifting its reserve assets massively away from government bonds for that shiny, precious metal.

Performance data/data sources: LSEG Workspace DataStream, ICE Data Services, Bloomberg, AXA IM, as of 11 September 2025, unless otherwise stated). Past performance should not be seen as a guide to future returns.

........
Disclaimer This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities. It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date. All information in this document is established on data made public by official providers of economic and market statistics. AXA Investment Managers disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this document. All exhibits included in this document, unless stated otherwise, are as of the publication date of this document. Furthermore, due to the subjective nature of these opinions and analysis, these data, projections, forecasts, anticipations, hypothesis, etc. are not necessary used or followed by AXA IM’s portfolio management teams or its affiliates, who may act based on their own opinions. Any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part is, unless otherwise authorised by AXA IM, prohibited.

Chris Iggo
Chair of the AXA IM Investment Institute and CIO of AXA IM Core
AXA Investment Managers

Chris Iggo is the Chief Investment Officer for Core Investments and Chair of the AXA IM Investment Institute. In his role, Chris brings together the insights of the Research, Quant Lab and Responsible Investment teams for the benefit of all...

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.

Comments

Sign In or Join Free to comment