Why you shouldn't be scared of investing in China

We believe the fundamentals are in place for emerging markets to outperform developed markets, writes Dr Joseph Lai of Ox Capital. In this wire, he discusses his confidence in China and what this means for surrounding markets.
Dr Joseph Lai

Ox Capital

We believe the fundamentals are in place for emerging markets to outperform developed markets. In the first part of a series into why we are bullish on this thematic, we discuss our confidence in China and what this means for surrounding markets. The core drivers for this include China's favourable debt profile, risk management policies and pre-emptive central bank activity. 

Domestic consumption is fuelling the growth of China

China has driven global economic growth, but it is not just the ‘manufacturer of the world’. Domestic consumption fuels the growth of China.

China is the world’s second-largest economy and undoubtedly the world’s biggest manufacturing economy. However, the majority of the manufacturing sector in China is used to serve its domestic market, with exports to the US remaining in the low single digits as a percentage of its GDP.

Chinese factories complement factories in the other Asian countries, such as Vietnam, to manufacture for the majority of the world. Irrespective of the noise over the US and China trade dispute, the global supply chain is going to remain firmly entrenched in the Asian region for years to come, with factories moving mostly within Asia to take advantage of changing and differing labour costs.

China has been deleveraging over the past decade

Economic growth has been led in emerging markets by the locomotive of the huge Chinese economy. China has spent the last 10 years cleaning up its balance sheet. Further, it continues to undertake the necessary reforms of its private and public sectors.

Multiple rounds of deleveraging in China has been painful for companies and investors alike. China had to wean itself off huge stimulus post the GFC, then clamp down on speculation which existed across the housing market and lending space. The level of indebtedness has stabilised as a result of many rounds of reforms and crackdowns. China’s total debt is now not that different to that of many of its developed country peers.

The one segment of debt that China leads against developed market peers, is its high level of indebtedness to corporates. However, it is important to unpack where this debt is being placed. In China, the majority of corporate debt is related to state-owned enterprise (SOE) lending. These loans are used to build infrastructure projects for the public such as bridges and tunnels, or upstream plants for say the aluminium or cement industry.

Demand for investment in such infrastructure has been much less enthusiastic recently due to dampened economic activity. In fact, the regulators have put in very strict rules over new investments in this area. The level of corporate debt in China has largely held steady for the last five years. This is a promising sign!

There has been persistent concern over China’s property market. However, the level of mortgage loans, as reflected in household credit to GDP, is not high compared to that of many developed markets.

Loans to property developers have also been growing at a slower rate. No doubt this will slow even more after the recent regulatory crackdown on property developers.

Some would be surprised to learn that government debt to GDP is also significantly lower in China compared to the US, Europe, and Japan.

Figure 5: Government Debt to GDP

Source: BIS

Emerging markets have not stimulated as much as developed markets during the pandemic

During the pandemic, global debt surged to a record high. The use of debt during the pandemic has been particularly aggressive in developed markets, who borrowed heavily to stimulate their economies and support their ageing populations.

Emerging markets as a whole have been more fiscally responsible during the COVID-19 pandemic than developed markets. We can see this through in lower levels of fiscal and monetary stimulus as a percentage of GDP. Emerging markets are coming out of strict lockdowns with a small portion of the stimulus compared to developed markets.

Figure 6: Global debt as a percentage of GDP

Source: IMF. Note: Estimated ratios are weighted by each country’s GDP in USD

China has cracked down on bubbles in the economy in the past

Regulatory crackdown in China is nothing new. China has been cracking down on various sectors for over 15 years.

Across popular media, the crackdown in China has been largely attributed to a more assertive Chinese Government and leadership. We are not here to dispute this. However, we prefer to focus our efforts on the economic and investment question: what is the longer-term economic impact of these reforms?

We have written about the regulation crackdowns previously. Our firm belief is that while it is impossible to know the absolute outcome, reforms have been recurrent, and will be an ongoing feature of any economy in rapid transition and economic development.

The intention for the most part is to improve the economic prospects of the country, by putting in guard rails and rules to reduce dysfunction. Firms negatively impacted by reform obviously suffer from the crackdowns. We have seen this in rock-bottom valuations across much of the Chinese internet sector in 2021.

These reforms also demonstrate the authority’s willingness to forgo the economic interests of a small proportion of people for the betterment of the masses. Our work suggests previous big crackdowns have led to better outcomes for the economy. In the years following the changes, weighty returns have been seen in the indexes which correspond to the sectors which saw large reform.

The numerous crackdowns over the last decade have also acted to reduce risk in the Chinese banking system. The last and most recent crackdown on the property market was famously seen through the case of Evergrande and other less publicised but highly indebted developers. Developers that are cavalier users of debt have lost their businesses. Property prices had gone up during the COVID-19 period in 2020, like most other countries, but this round of credit crackdown squeezed a lot of air out prices. These obviously have short-term implications on consumption and equity prices, but longer-term we see this as positive.

Chinese ADRs are a very attractive opportunity

Domestic investors are much less concerned about China’s economic prospects than the press would have its readers believe. Share market performance in 2021 of China’s domestic markets, which are mostly made up of local investors, held up much better than Chinese stocks listed internationally. This is clearly evidenced below, where we see a significant divergence among Chinese equity markets. Domestic Chinese-listed A-shares stayed resilient in 2021, however, US-listed ADRs (American Depositary Receipts) halved in market value.

Our thought piece on Chinese ADRs evaluates the risks of Chinese stocks de-listing in the US, the opportunity for Chinese technology companies listed in the US, and the huge financial market dislocation which exists between these companies and the rest of the world.

Figure 7: Chinese Equity Market Performance in 2021

Source: Jefferies

China is going through a slowdown due to pre-emptive monetary policy tightening

Chinese authorities tightened monetary policy early in 2021. The pandemic was well contained, and they were able to cut off stimulus early. The cost of cutting off stimulus was weak asset prices; however, the benefit came in reduced inflationary pressures, which are inherent when printing money.

Tightening of Chinese monetary policy has meant that real interest rates in China are closer to neutral compared to that of developed countries like the US, which are still way below zero.

As a result of China’s prudent policies, foreign money has continued to pile into Chinese Government bonds.

Figure 8: Foreign holdings of Chinese Government Bonds 

Source: Jefferies, China Bond Connect, CEIC Data

Savings abundance in China

Much has been said about the savings levels of US consumers, particularly changes as the result of COVID-19 related transfer payments. If we compare personal savings as a percentage of disposable income between the US and China over the past 40 years, we see a clear savings differential. Chinese personal savings accounting for over 30% of disposable income in 2021, whereas in the US this figure was below 15%, or less than half.

Figure 9: China and US personal savings as a percentage of disposable income 

Source: Jefferies, China National Bureau of Statistics, CEIC Data, US Bureau of Economic Analysis

Commodity prices and their relationship to EMs

The other part of the emerging markets story historically is commodities; more specifically their prices. Many emerging market countries are commodity producers. While China is transitioning from being a construction-led to a consumption-led economy, demand for certain commodities will persist - although demand growth for commodities will be less rosy than it has been in the past. The good news is that this slowed growth has not been missed by commodity producers and supply discipline is in place. Investment project approvals for commodity producers is few and far between these days. Further, the ESG movement has introduced reputational risks for these producers, further limiting supply.

A smoother but slower Chinese economic growth rate, and a less supplied commodities sector, in a less globalised world, will likely lead to a higher level of inflation. This is a breath of fresh air in emerging markets, who have suffered from the abrupt go-stop Chinese economic engine and oversupplied commodities over the past decade or more.

The bottom line

To summarise, emerging market economies are significantly less indebted compared to the developed world and valuations in stock markets much more attractive. In addition, interest rates have already been adjusted upwards, making investment in emerging markets an attractive prospect going forward.

Keep an eye out for future parts of the collection: 

Take advantage of the rapid growth in Asia and emerging markets

Lai's investment approach is to identify the immense changes taking place in Asia and other key emerging markets to find investment opportunities. To learn more, visit the Ox Capital website, or see the Fund Profile below.

Managed Fund
Ox Capital Dynamic Emerging Markets Fund
Global Shares
Livewire gives readers access to information and educational content provided by financial services professionals and companies ("Livewire Contributors"). Livewire does not operate under an Australian financial services licence and relies on the exemption available under section 911A(2)(eb) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in respect of any advice given. Any advice on this site is general in nature and does not take into consideration your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before making a decision please consider these and any relevant Product Disclosure Statement. Livewire has commercial relationships with some Livewire Contributors.

1 fund mentioned

Dr Joseph Lai
Chief Investment Officer
Ox Capital

Joseph is responsible for overseeing the investment process, risk management and management of the portfolios. Joseph spent 17 years at Platinum Asset Management, in which he was the Portfolio Manager for the Platinum Asia Fund, Head of Asia...

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.


Sign In or Join Free to comment