Excess in the Australian housing market has been widely discussed by investors and commentators for a number of years. Underpinned by cheap money, house prices have risen significantly resulting in extreme valuations (house prices are nearly 9x average incomes).
Other signs of a housing bubble have also emerged:
- Investment in housing is extreme (fig 3);
- the percentage of people employed in construction is close to bubble-like levels (i.e. similar to those of Spain and Ireland ahead of the GFC);
- the household debt to GDP ratio is one of the highest in the world (121.3%);
- and mortgage debt has grown almost twice the pace of GDP in the last 10 years.
Fig 3: Private investment in dwellings (as % of GDP) vs. house prices (Y-o-Y, %)
With house prices and housing activity now declining sharply, those excesses have begun to unwind and key leading indicators point to ongoing weakness:
- Building permits, for example, are down 19% Y-o-Y1 (and tend to lead house price growth by ~3 months).
- In addition, transactions are down 32% Y-o-Y,
- While growth in mortgage lending is contracting at the fastest pace in 8 years (both transactions and mortgage lending lead house price growth).
Recession is likely
Whilst it is impossible to be certain a bubble has burst/is bursting ex ante, there is strong evidence that this is the case in Australia. Bubbles tend to burst when money becomes expensive. In that respect, rising pressure on commercial bank funding costs will continue to feed through into the housing sector via higher mortgage rates (fig 2) and should result in further house price weakness.
Fig 2: New residential mortgage loans (Y-o-Y, %) vs. change in variable mortgage rates (INVERTED & advanced 6m, p.p.)
As the wealth effect from rising house prices reverses, households should continue to deleverage and their savings rate should start to pick up (as is typical during housing downturns, fig 1). This will, in turn, result in weak/contracting household consumption growth (i.e. the primary component of GDP), and should result in a recession later this year or early next year.
Fig 1: House price growth (adv. 6m) vs. household savings rate (9m smoothed, inverted)
Rates headed to zero
Whilst a series of RBA rate cuts is therefore likely (beginning in the latter half of this year), that policy response is probably too late, given that policy works with lags and downward momentum in housing is already underway. We expect the RBA to cut rates to zero and potentially use other policies, e.g. QE.
In the event of a systemic banking crisis (not our base case – 20-25% probability), it is also likely that significant government intervention would take place to recapitalise Australian banks.
The full report
You can view a copy of the full report here: (VIEW LINK)
I Totally agree Chris. We are heading into a recession, probably a slow burst! . It always takes a while for all the negatives to filter through and compound. What happens when rates get to zero? and other countries debts keep piling on? Maybe a good time to dollar cost average into gold and gold producing shares. They always seem to do we'll in times of uncertainty.
It is not only the cost of money that is the main issue today but the availability of funding - there is less credit being approved for borrowers.
Those who kneel before the alter of monetary policy, are like religious fanatics, oblivious to the obvious. Following years of negative real interest rates asset bubbles abound and yet their response: create more and larger asset bubbles.
I agree with David Yabsley. lowering interest rates to zero would drive ridiculous asset bubbles such as residential property, as if that hasn't been silly enough already. I see nothing wrong with homes becoming slightly more affordable, or should I say slightly less ridiculously expensive, for home buyers to buy, and a recession is not the end of the world.
But if the RBA cuts rates, that would have a positive effect on Equities (with some exceptions, of course, related to housing and consumption), would it not? Isn't that how stock prices became elevated in the first place?
that will fan next round of property mania!
This is poor analysis. What is being shown are outcomes of some drivers, some causes. There are a whole mix of yet other causes either positive or negative which shape the overall economy, for example the improving trade terms of increased LNG exports, the budget deficit and fiscal policy, the gap in our interest rates and the rest of the world.