Shares hit by turbulence – US banks, inflation, interest rates and recession risk – what does it mean for investors?

If you thought 2022 was hard, 2023 has started even harder. But Shane Oliver of AMP argues the one-year view is better than it sounds.

Shares have hit turbulence again with worries about inflation, interest rates, recession and, now, problems in US banks. After rallying strongly at the start of the year the US share market has reversed much of its year to date gain leaving it down 20% from its January high last year and at risk of a retest of its October lows when it was down 25%. Non-US shares are holding up better with Eurozone shares down by 7% & Australian shares also down 9% from their record highs but are vulnerable to moves in US shares. This note looks at the key worries and what it means for investors.

Are we going to see systemic problems in US banks?

Three regional US lenders have collapsed or closed in recent days. Silicon Valley Bank, which had a deposit base from tech (and some crypto) companies and customers, collapsed after running into trouble as deposits were withdrawn in the face of tough conditions in the tech and crypto sectors. 

Silvergate Capital & Signature Bank, crypto friendly banks, also closed after they were made vulnerable after the collapse of FTX crypto exchange. These closures have led to concerns they may reflect the start of broader problems in US banks. This is quite possible as Fed rate hiking cycles by tightening financial conditions invariably trigger financial stresses - think the tech wreck and GFC. 

That banks exposed to tech and crypto either for deposits or lending are in trouble is not surprising as both sectors benefitted from the pandemic and easy money but have been hard hit by reopening and rate hikes. And its made worse where banks have concentrated investments in long term bonds which have fallen in value as SVB did – so if they have to sell them to meet withdrawals it’s at a loss. 

For example, there are reported to be $US620 billion of unrealised losses on securities at US banks – of course it’s only a problem if they have to sell them. But at this stage it’s too early to know if problems at these lenders reflect isolated problems in the tech & crypto sectors they’re exposed to, made worse by un-diversified deposit bases & concentrated holdings of bonds that have fallen in value or are a sign of a broader problem in the US financial system.

Fortunately, there are some reasons to suggest that worst case scenarios involving a flow on more broadly in the US and beyond may be limited:

  • US authorities have moved quickly to guarantee deposits (beyond the $US250,000 usually covered by deposit insurance) and the Fed has unveiled a Term Funding Facility that enables banks to borrow cheaply from the Fed in order to avoid selling their bonds at a loss. This should help reduce the risk of runs on banks and avoid a fire sale of bonds. And it should help minimise bigger problems for companies that had deposits at these banks – like layoffs & not paying creditors.
  • Following the GFC large US banks now have to maintain large capital buffers, have less risky exposures or at least less concentrated asset exposures and have more diverse deposit bases than regional banks. Unfortunately, restrictions were eased for smaller banks in 2018.
  • It should also be remembered that US regional bank failures are common – there were 8 in 2018-20 – albeit they were much smaller.
  • All Australian banks are required post GFC to maintain much stronger capital buffers and have tougher restrictions in terms of what they can invest in. They also have very diverse deposit bases so are less at risk of high deposit withdrawals than regional US banks. And they won’t have as much exposure to the vulnerable tech and crypto sectors. And Australian bank deposits are implicitly (if not explicitly) protected. But of course, they are vulnerable to defaults by Australian home borrowers particularly if the property market falls precipitously.

However, it will take a while to determine the full impact and for the dust to settle. And either way banks are likely to see a tougher environment ahead as growth slows and higher rates cause more financial stress for borrowers. It probably also means even tighter lending conditions for tech and crypto and for illiquid businesses like private equity and commercial property. And it’s a sign that Fed tightening has got traction! 

But what about inflation?

As indicated in the chart above, past financial crisis in the US have resulted in an end to Fed tightening cycles. At this point its not clear that we are seeing a full-blown crisis unfold or not and high inflation is a bit of a barrier on what the Fed can do. 

As a result, so far it’s just gone down the path of making it easier for banks to access cheap funding so they don’t have to sell bonds at a loss. But how far the Fed and other central banks can support economies will at least partly be impacted by inflation.

Right now, it’s too high but it looks to have peaked. US and Canadian inflation peaked around mid-last year, inflation in Europe later last year. Australian inflation likely peaked in December. Supply bottlenecks have improved, freight costs have fallen and slowing demand will reduce demand side inflation. 

As is often the case, goods price inflation is leading with services price inflation more sticky reflecting still tight labour markets – but these are showing signs of rolling over with job openings according to Indeed rolling over in the US, Europe and Australia. Wages growth is a key driver of services inflation – but in the US it looks to be slowing and in Australia there are no signs of a wages blowout. Easing inflation pressure is reflected in a declining trend in business surveys with respect to input and output prices and work backlogs & delivery times have fallen to normal levels. And if US bank sector problems depress economic activity, it will put more downwards pressure on inflation. 

Does this mean central banks are nearly done?

If we are right and inflation will fall going forward, albeit with bumps along the way, then central banks are at or near the top and will have more flexibility to respond to financial crisis like the issues now in the US. Indeed, the US banking problems with the risk of a flow on to other countries (where banks also have losses on their bond portfolios) may put pressure on other central banks to provide liquidity support.

  • The ECB is lagging and has further to go than other central banks on rate hikes – but US problems may cause it to slow down.
  • The Bank of Canada has held rates at 4.5% at looks to have peaked.
  • The Fed has been signalling more rate hikes ahead following a recent run of stronger data – but leading US indicators point to slower demand with a high risk of recession (which would slow inflation) and there are tentative signs that the US jobs market is slowing. Bank problems – with the risk of more to come - should help slow the Fed at least heading off a 0.5% hike next week. Our base case is a 0.25% hike but if banking stresses remain high it’s likely to pause. In fact, based on past Fed hiking cycles the collapse in the US 2 year bond yield below the Fed Funds rates suggests the Fed is done!
  • The RBA has become less hawkish & has opened the door to a pause if data shows further cooling & slowing inflation. With total household debt servicing costs pushing to record levels our view is the RBA should and will soon pause. US financial problems add to the case.  

What is the risk of recession?

This will likely be critical to how shares perform this year as the historical record shows that deep bear markets in US (and Australian) shares are invariably associated with US recessions. 

While the risk of recession has receded in Europe (with the collapse in gas prices) it remains high in the US with various leading indicators – including inverted yield curves (where short term interest rates are above long term yields) - warning of a high risk of US recession in the next 6-12 months. 

Problems in the financial system are adding to this risk which could easily push US shares down beyond the 25% top to bottom fall seen last year. However, if the Fed soon stops tightening a US recession could still be averted or it could be mild which would limit further downside in US shares.

In Australia, the risk of recession is high. But our base case is that it will be avoided thanks to strong business investment, Chinese reopening and providing the RBA soon stops hiking and US financial contagion is limited. 

What should all this mean for investors?

We see shares being stronger on a one-year view as inflation falls taking pressure of central banks hopefully enabling economies to avoid a deep recession. However, right now shares are at risk of more downside until some of the issues around the US financial system, inflation, recession and short-term interest rates are resolved. There are several implications for investors:

  • Unlike last year, investment in government bonds should provide more protection for investors as bond yields are now higher and have potential to fall if worries of recession rise as we saw in the last week.

  • Non-US shares are likely to outperform US shares as they are trading on lower price to earnings multiples and have a lower exposure to the tech sector. This includes the Australian share market.

  • For short term investors it’s a time to be cautious.

However, while times like these can be stressful, for superannuation members and most investors the best approach is to stick to basic investment principles. These things are worth keeping in mind:
  1. Share market pullbacks are healthy and normal - their volatility is the price we pay for the higher returns they provide over the long term;
  2. It’s very hard to time market moves so the key is to stick to an appropriate long-term investment strategy;
  3. Selling shares after a fall locks in a loss;
  4. Share pullbacks provide opportunities for investors to invest cheaply;
  5. Shares invariably bottom with maximum bearishness;
  6. Australian shares still offer attractive income versus bank deposits, and
  7. To avoid getting thrown off a long-term strategy – it’s best to turn down the noise around all the negative news flow.
Livewire gives readers access to information and educational content provided by financial services professionals and companies (“Livewire Contributors”). Livewire does not operate under an Australian financial services licence and relies on the exemption available under section 911A(2)(eb) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in respect of any advice given. Any advice on this site is general in nature and does not take into consideration your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before making a decision please consider these and any relevant Product Disclosure Statement. Livewire has commercial relationships with some Livewire Contributors.

Shane Oliver
Head of Investment Strategy and Chief Economist

Shane joined AMP in 1984 and is Chief Economist and Head of Investment Strategy. Shane has extensive experience analysing economic and investment cycles and what current positioning means for the return potential for different asset classes.

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.


Sign In or Join Free to comment