The three big themes you can’t ignore

Jay Sivapalan, Head of Australian Fixed Interest, identifies three macro themes investors should bear in mind as they navigate the evolving investment landscape.
Jay Sivapalan

Janus Henderson

Looking to 2023 and beyond, we see a number of structural forces akin to tectonic plates moving within the global economic landscape. These are worthy of investor attention and will likely determine asset allocation and returns over the coming decade. Getting the big picture right will be vital for investors, creating risks, along with abundant opportunities.

Following the pandemic recovery, markets are burdened with the task of ‘normalising’ from extraordinary levels of monetary and fiscal support. Finding natural market pricing after the COVID-driven distortions is unlikely to be an orderly process, particularly given the very different world we find ourselves in today.

Rather than assuming a return to pre-pandemic norms and the stability enjoyed over the past few decades, we believe investors must factor in some key macro themes going forward

In this article, I discuss the disruptive nature of these themes and why they should matter to investors.

Macro themes in a changing world

The world’s alignment into trading blocs:

In recent years, while events such as Brexit and the US/China trade wars led to the growing view that markets are de-globalising, our view is that rather than the start of de-globalisation, we are in fact witnessing the re-arrangement of global trade into like-minded trading, security and defence blocs.

We see two main groups emerging – democratic, capitalist developed nations along with their aligned developing partner nations, and socialist, communist nations with their developing nation peers. Recent geopolitical events, such as the West’s response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine provide a glimpse into these alliances in action.

That said, while freer trade within blocs will be more efficient, in situations where raw materials or efficient production are too hard or too costly to substitute, we still expect trade to continue across bloc lines. This should limit the economic impact for resource-rich countries like Australia, but trade could be disrupted in times of heightened tension, as experienced by the Australian agriculture sector in recent years due to a strained relationship with China.

Nationalisation or national security?

Today, assertive actions from Russia and China aimed at challenging the United States’ status as the ultimate super-power are becoming more commonplace.

When cut off from the rest of the world during the pandemic, nations’ vulnerabilities to supply dislocations and weaknesses in their manufacturing sectors were laid bare.

While there has been a suggestion by market participants that a trend of nationalisation has emerged, this implies countries are pursuing a closed economic model. 

We believe that rather than nationalism, economies are more likely to pursue an agenda of national resilience and security while remaining open to trade. 

‘Resilience’ for a country like Australia means becoming self-sufficient in a period of growing geo-political instability. We expect investment in defence, cyber-security, health systems and advanced manufacturing, as well as other sectors identified as vulnerabilities.

Over the past 70 years, governments, market participants and businesses have been able to take relative geo-political stability for granted. However, the rise of major powers, each with competing agendas of influence and expansion could see confrontation and conflict erupt. This could result in rapid escalation where military pacts commit nations to support their fellow members. In this uncertain environment, companies and markets will demand higher risk premia to compensate them for the additional risk on their capital.

The renewable energy revolution

The transition to renewable energy and targeting net zero emissions is likely to give rise to opportunities and risks for investors. The risks range from physical asset risk, stranded asset risk and revenue loss, while the potential opportunities resulting from this multi-trillion dollar, long-term investment theme are broad and include initiatives related to green hydrogen, solar, wind, hydro-electric power generation and battery storage, along with the infrastructure required to enable the electrification of the economy.

Beyond emissions targets, the Labor government has committed to a target of 80% renewable energy in the electricity mix by 2030. The government aims to achieve this through community batteries, low-cost solar banks, new electricity transmission infrastructure and improvements in the existing industry’s energy efficiency.

With large-scale capital investment, Australia has the potential to become a leader in renewable energy generation. Being endowed with abundant space, along with sun, wind and river systems, Australia’s renewable energy needs could be catered for domestically, while surpluses could be exported to neighbouring countries, enabling an economic growth engine if the opportunity can be seized.

The energy transition will require the reallocation of capital away from fossil fuel energy generation, along with levels of new investment not seen in decades. This transition will be costly and is likely to manifest in higher consumer energy prices.

Cyclical drivers

The above structural themes, along with cyclical elements must be considered in order to gain an understanding of the future path of monetary policy, term risk premia and risk-free yields – crucial factors in the valuation of all asset classes.

Cyclical inflation, primarily driven by pandemic-induced supply-side shocks, pent up demand and high levels of consumer savings, should peak very shortly and subside in 2023. In our assessment, near-term inflation is likely to be sticky and last longer than markets anticipated but will normalise nonetheless. Many of the initial supply issues have been resolved with their prices heading back down. However, second-round inflation such as rents, energy and wages will take longer to resolve, especially at ‘above full employment’ labour market conditions. We expect to see meaningful progress towards the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) inflation targets next year, even though they may not be fully met until 2024 given the significant monetary policy tightening and fiscal restraint observed this year.

The path ahead

With such an array of themes at play, one thing is clear, the path ahead for the economy won’t have the same degree of stability and certainty that investors have enjoyed for the past few decades. Therefore, having an understanding of how markets and the geo-political landscape can shift in response to these macro themes will help investors to navigate the path ahead.

This journey will be neither smooth nor easily predictable and active management and careful analysis will be vital in identifying the risks and opportunities that will emerge.

Learn more

For further insights from the team at Janus Henderson, please visit our website

Managed Fund
Janus Henderson Tactical Income Fund
Australian Fixed Income
........
This information is issued by Janus Henderson Investors (Australia) Institutional Funds Management Limited (AFSL 444266, ABN 16 165 119 531). The information herein shall not in any way constitute advice or an invitation to invest. It is solely for information purposes and subject to change without notice. This information does not purport to be a comprehensive statement or description of any markets or securities referred to within. Any references to individual securities do not constitute a securities recommendation. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Whilst Janus Henderson Investors (Australia) Institutional Funds Management Limited believe that the information is correct at the date of this document, no warranty or representation is given to this effect and no responsibility can be accepted by Janus Henderson Investors (Australia) Institutional Funds Management Limited to any end users for any action taken on the basis of this information. All opinions and estimates in this information are subject to change without notice and are the views of the author at the time of publication. Janus Henderson Investors (Australia) Institutional Funds Management Limited is not under any obligation to update this information to the extent that it is or becomes out of date or incorrect.

2 topics

1 fund mentioned

Jay Sivapalan
Head of Australian Fixed Interest
Janus Henderson

Jay Sivapalan is Head of Australian Fixed Interest and a Portfolio Manager at Janus Henderson Investors. He contributes to both interest rate and sector strategies employed within portfolios and has 22 years of financial industry experience.

Expertise

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.

Comments

Sign In or Join Free to comment