Time to switch channels
Both News Corp (ASX: NWS) and Nine Entertainment (ASX: NEC) are media stocks, and we think this is a like-for-like switch in terms of portfolio characteristics, but we have a preference for NEC at its current price and current fundamentals.
We prefer NEC as:
- Its fundamental metrics appear more favourable relative to NWS
- NEC has a higher quality earnings base (excluding real estate)
- NEC is less cyclical and more resilient than the market is implying
- Domain (DHG) (owned by NEC) looks to be at a better valuation point than REA Group (REA) (owned by NWS)
- NEC has a proven history of organic growth
- NEC has higher expected returns to shareholders
- NEC has valuation appeal
NEC looks better positioned in terms of fundamentals versus NWS. NEC has:
- A lower earnings multiple (significantly lower PE multiple)
- Superior margins
- A higher dividend yield (with franking)
- Superior ROE and ROIC %
Figure 1: NEC has better fundamentals
A Well-Priced Quality Cyclical
We characterise NEC as a quality cyclical. A quality cyclical usually has an embedded structural growth story that should drive superior earnings growth in the medium-term. As these stocks are more sensitive to economic conditions, growth may be hindered by a downturn in the cycle. However, the structural growth drivers should outweigh the cyclicality over the medium to long-term.
For NEC, the structural story is a shift to digital assets and a larger subscription base, that we believe should outweigh the cyclicality of the advertising cycle.
Figure 2: NEC has grown its digital EBITDA at a fast pace
NEC's subscription business was 32% of revenue in FY22 (up from 20% in FY21). Subscription revenue has grown 28% YoY, and we think this growth will continue (albeit at a slower pace), offsetting the loss in ad spend in a more turbulent FY23.
The current market turbulence may represent a good opportunity to buy a quality cyclical in Nine at a reasonable price after it has experienced a challenging period in the broader sell-off.
Higher quality asset base
While NWS is also leveraged to digitalisation, we think the story is currently more compelling in NEC than in NWS. Nine has grown its digital assets at a fast pace over the last few years, and we think this trend will continue.
NEC also has less exposure to legacy assets in structural decline like book publishing and cable TV (i.e., Foxtel).
More digital = margin expansion and less cyclicality
The digital proportion of Nine’s underlying revenues has grown strongly in recent years. This has also supported margin growth, as these digital revenues tend to generate higher margins than print or broadcasting assets.
There is still a large runway for digital growth in Nine’s media business, which should be driven by its streaming services (STAN and, importantly, high-margin STAN Sport) and On Demand (i.e. 9NOW).
While News Corp is moving to a streaming service in the forms of Kayo (Sport) and Binge, it is doing this while transitioning away from the cable TV business. Nine does not have this distraction.
The higher degree of digital transformation should offset volatility in ad markets. We believe digital and recurring, subscription-based revenues are stickier and less cyclical than traditional print and TV ad revenues, therefore underpinning a higher degree of earnings visibility. We think this is underappreciated by the market.
We believe higher earnings visibility and higher margins should lead to a rerate in the stock valuation from 11x.
Although the market is currently estimating flat earnings growth for Nine and News Corp over the next few years, we think the risk is to the upside on earnings as the market underestimates the speed and impact of the digital shift.
REA/DHG Premium Gap Hard To Justify
Both Nine and News Corp own 59% and 61% of Domain (DHG) and REA respectively.
REA currently sits on a premium to DHG. We believe REA deserves this premium, but the extent of the premium now looks too high relative to fundamentals. It can be argued that REA has a larger market share and higher margins, and therefore deserves a premium. However, the premium has increased significantly since the beginning of this calendar year.
Figure 3: REA’s premium looks too high compared to DHG
We think this premium is too high. DHG has a stronger earnings growth profile than REA. We would prefer to be leveraged to the stock with the larger growth opportunity and significantly lower multiple. Therefore we have a preference for NEC, as it has exposure to DHG rather than NWS with exposure to REA.
Figure 4: DHG growth is expected to be superior to REA
NEC Has a History of Organic Growth
Nine organically created Stan and Domain (as Fairfax) and didn’t need to acquire businesses (at a potential premium) like NWS to grow its earnings. NEC has a high ROE and ROIC relative to NWS. This indicates that NEC should have a superior ability to grow with less capital, making it easier to grow earning over the medium term. The ability for NEC to grow organically at a lower capital spend is also key to our preference for NEC over NWS.
Higher Capital Returns to Shareholders
NEC also has a recently announced intention to buyback 10% of its share capital. We think this reflects NEC’s confidence in its medium-term outlook, which will eclipse the current, smaller NWS buyback (~8%) that is now ~30% complete.
NEC Has Hidden Value
We have always held NWS for its hidden value, and NEC has this as well. Both the media and publishing assets of NEC look cheap (relative to global peers) once you strip out the market value of the real estate assets.
Figure 5: Hidden value implies upside for NEC
We believe the market currently underappreciates the intrinsic value of Nine’s core assets. Considering DHG trades on an FY23 EV/EBITDA of ~14.8x and the overall group trades at ~6.5x, the implied multiple of its remaining media segments is ~5.2x.
Valuation Attractive Versus History
Nine looks cheap relative to history on a PE multiple. We also believe as the stock becomes more digital and more subscription-based, the stock could rerate to a higher multiple. NWS is already at a multiple of 18x: therefore, we think there is less room for a rerate.
Figure 6: NEC’s valuation looks cheap relative to its historical average
While earnings are expected to be lower in NEC, we think the risk is to the upside while NEC transitions to digital and subscription-based revenue.
WILSONS think differently and delve deeper to uncover a broad range of interesting investment opportunities for their clients. To read more of our latest research, visit our Research and Insights.
MORE ON Equities
2 stocks mentioned
Rob joined Wilsons in 2020 as an equity strategist within the Investment Strategy Group. The group focuses on global asset allocation, international and Australian equity portfolios and multi-asset portfolio construction. Rob supports the...