Bond yields – a disruptor to REIT fundamentals

Amy Pham

Pengana Capital Group

The sharp rise in bond rates from below 1% at the end of last year to now 1.7% caused a sell-off in yield-sensitive sectors such as REITs. Consistent with market trends, the steepening yield curve favoured “value” stocks such as Scentre Group (SCG) and Vicinity Group (VCX) over “growth” stocks such as Goodman Group (GMG) and Charter Hall (CHC), despite the divergence in fundamentals witnessed over the reporting season.

Overall, reporting season was a mixed bag with profits boosted by one-off effects, such as in the retail sector with REITs reversing their COVID provisions and benefitting from short-term rental relief. In terms of earnings guidance and upgrades, there was a vast improvement compared to August last year. The majority of REITs provided earnings guidance, with the exceptions being the large retail REITs such as VCX, SCG, and Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield (URW). A number of REITs provided upgraded FY21 earnings guidance, including GMG raising its FY21 year-on-year guidance by 3% and CHC increasing its FY21 guidance by 4%.

So where to from here? 

We believe the reopening trade (commencing in November with the announcement of a vaccine) and now the value trade (with the rise in bond yields), have been fully captured and have in fact overshot valuations. SCG for example, since rebasing its distribution to 14 cps, is now yielding 5% (instead of 8% on FY19 distributions) and is no longer attractive compared to its REIT peers. GMG and CHC however, which have historically traded at premiums to the market PE, are now trading at discounts.

Despite bond yields having risen sharply over the month, they remain at historically low levels. We believe this is as good as it gets for REITs with cap rate compression doing most of the heavy lifting over the past five years. This is the time REITs should deleverage their balance sheets to drive earnings growth through acquisitions or developments. Both GMG and CHC have the strongest balance sheets in the sector with less than 5% gearing and capacity of greater than $2.8 billion and greater than $6 billion respectively. They both have strong development pipelines with structural tailwinds driving future demand. For GMG this is reflected in their WIP (work in progress) of $8.4 billion, nearly double that of the corresponding period last year, and projected production rate of $5 billion per annum, generating strong margins that will support earnings growth over the medium term. CHC has demonstrated an ability to grow FUM at 30% per annum, has high recurring fees (no performance fees included in the guidance), a diversified portfolio with a long WALE (weighted average lease expiry) of 9.1 years, and is best placed to grow in the alternatives sector and participate in sale and leaseback transactions.

On the flip side, we see continued earnings pressure for large retail REITs: SCG and VCX. With poor operating matrices (significant negative leasing spread of -12 to -15%, sales MAT (moving annual turnover) of -18%, and low earnings visibility) along with the continued structural shift to online retailing putting pressure on valuations.

On capital management, there is a continued concern on the amount of cap-ex needed to reconfigure assets with David Jones, Target, Myer, Kmart, etc. closing stores over time and the absence of large offshore retailers coming to fill this space. Recently, Myer flagged an additional ~70,000sqm of space reduction in the near-term. Admittedly, VCX has a stronger balance sheet than SCG with gearing at 24% versus 38% (including subordinated notes, which SCG treats as equity). However, in recent years both VCX and SCG’s main developments have been in mixed-use projects such as hotels, residential, and office, which indicates that the return on capital is not there for retail.

Another way to value passive REITs is P/NTA, which reflects the replacement cost in the event of a wind-up. This provides an indication of when a corporate may become more active in share buyback programs or M&A. In this reporting season we witnessed Dexus Group (DXS), GPT Group (GPT), and Growthpoint (GOZ) activating share buybacks with their share price trading at an average 20% discount to NTA. In recent years, transactional evidence has mainly been in office and industrial with offshore demand sustaining sales at or above book for office. Cap rate compression remains strong in industrials and particularly in logistics assets. Retail valuations for large malls seem to have stabilised from the large falls of >10% in August to now -6% for VCX and flat for SCG. With minimal transaction evidence and the structural headwind facing retail, we don’t see support for a recovery in valuations.

On this basis, we see SCG trading on a similar discount to NTA with DXS and GPT of around 20% discount a disparity given the higher risk.

For alternative assets such as logistics, childcare, retirement, self-storage, and long WALE assets, these have all realised the greatest cap rate compression and in return NTA appreciation. This is not surprising given the resilience of cash flows as well as capital demand for these sub-sectors.

With our focus on positive free cash flow, strong balance sheet, favourable thematics, and long WALE, we maintain our preference for CHC and GMG (over SCG and VCX), high-quality office such as DXS, and alternative assets, in which the portfolio has a 40%+ exposure, such as childcare (CQE), retirement living (LIC), affordable housing (INA) and data centres (NXT). In our next webinar on the 4 May 2021 we will look at the year ahead for REITS

Never miss an insight

Enjoy this wire? Hit the ‘like’ button to let us know. Stay up to date with my content by hitting the ‘follow’ button below and you’ll be notified every time I post a wire. Not already a Livewire member? Sign up today to get free access to investment ideas and strategies from Australia’s leading investors.

........
Pengana Capital Ltd (ABN 30 103 800 568, Australian financial services license number 226566) is the issuer of units in the Pengana High Conviction Property Securities Fund (ARSN 639 011 180) (the “Fund”). A product disclosure statement for the Fund is available and can be obtained from our distribution team. A person should obtain a copy of the product disclosure statement and should consider the product disclosure statement carefully before deciding whether to acquire, or to continue to hold, or making any other decision in respect of, the units in the Fund. This report was prepared by Pengana Capital Ltd and does not contain any investment recommendation or investment advice. This report has been prepared without taking account of any person’s objectives, financial situation or needs. Therefore, before acting on any information contained within this report a person should consider the appropriateness of the information, having regard to their objectives, financial situation and needs. Neither Pengana Capital Ltd nor its related entities, directors or officers guarantees the performance of, or the repayment of capital or income invested in, the Fund.

Amy Pham
Fund Manager - Pengana High Conviction Property Securities Fund
Pengana Capital Group

Amy is portfolio manager of the Pengana High Conviction Property Securities Fund, and has over 20 years of property funds management experience. Previously, Amy has worked at Charter Hall/Folkestone for 6 years, managing a high conviction...

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.