Investors must tread carefully

Simon Doyle

On the back of the worst March quarter since 2008, indicators show the end of the current cycle is in sight. Trump’s jostle with China is more of a concern than his ‘war of Tweets’ with North Korea, and coupled with the inability of investors to rely on central bank intervention, investors must tread carefully.

The pick-up in volatility that began in February continued into March with most major equity markets posting low single digit losses. Australian equities were amongst the worst performers dropping around 4% in local currency terms. All major sectors declined, with the more defensive sectors outperforming. This trend was also reflected in credit markets with credit spreads generally moving wider across the month. Bond yields drifted lower in March, but given the weakness evident in risk assets over the period, the rally was relatively modest. Despite trade war fears and equity weakness the US dollar recovered a touch in March, with the AUD losing ground. GBP also gained ground amid UK Brexit negotiations.

The March quarter reflected one of the worst starts to the year since the GFC in 2008, in stark contrast to the very positive end to 2017. In many ways conditions aren’t all that different to late last year. Global growth remains relatively robust, inflation low and policy conditions broadly still favourable. At the margin though there has been a shift with seemingly unbridled optimism replaced by a more “realistic” assessment of the risks and challenges ahead. Higher underlying market volatility, lower equity prices, a more measured assessment of the risks of the large technology stocks amid growing pressure from the Trump administration for greater regulation in this area, and a generally (albeit still modest) widening in risk premium reflect this. From our perspective, 2018 is running much “closer to script” – our script anyway, than 2017. Timing though is everything! The critical question though is where to now.

Is this an opportunity to add risk assets to portfolios, or, is it the beginning of the end of the extended bull market?

We think the most likely outcome is probably somewhere in the middle.

On the positive side, the macro-economic picture remains reasonable. The global growth trajectory remains reasonably robust, economic indicators are, by and large, still very positive and on our analysis, the risk of recession this year remains low. Consistent with this, the near term outlook for profits looks reasonable.

Furthermore, while we have detailed our concerns about rising inflation, inflation pressure will build through time meaning we are still some way away from the point at which central banks (the US Fed leading the way) will need to shift the policy bias from “tightening” from a very accommodative starting point, to “tight”. It is the latter that will significantly raise recession risk.

However, strong economic conditions come with a cost, and that cost is reflected in rising core inflation (which is essentially why rates are rising) and perhaps more significantly given the contribution central banks have made to rising asset prices, a significant reduction in the flexibility of central banks to respond to volatility. The Fed Put can no longer be relied on. Investors will need to think a little more deeply about the risk of the investments they make as they no longer rely on Central banks to bail them out.

The most obvious immediate “wild card” is the risk of a global trade war (or at least one between the US and China). While mutual self-interest would suggest this may ultimately end up as more bluster than substance, it does have the potential if it accelerates to harm growth (particularly in the US and China) and add to inflation (a “stagflationary” risk). Unlike the US/North Korean “war of tweets” which had a low probability, high impact and arguably binary outcome, challenges to the global trade platform have potentially more real economic consequences.

We see it as a significant risk given the dynamic of the tussle between the US and China for broader global economic and political leadership which is unlikely to dissipate for some time.

To some extent these factors have been reflected in recent market volatility, but from a valuation standpoint most assets still reflect relatively demanding valuations / optimistic assumptions. Notwithstanding this, structural equity valuations (especially for the US) are still demanding. To put this in context, the weakness in US equity markets during February and March has raised our 3 year US equity return from -1% pa to +2% pa, significant, but hardly reflecting a compelling case to buy US stocks, particularly with our US bond return closer to 3% pa. Likewise the gap between interest rates (short and long) and the economy remain large – meaning the upside risk to yields remains (despite the moves we have seen already).

To summarise, we don’t believe we are staring into the abyss (this is not 2008), but the end of the cycle is in sight. We are judiciously adding some risk, so far mainly in higher yielding credit at the expense of more vanilla fixed income, but for the reasons outlined are treading cautiously.

You can read further insights from Schroders Multi-Asset team here


About this contributor

Simon Doyle

Simon Doyle

Head of Fixed Income & Multi-Asset, Schroders

Simon is responsible for Schroders' Australian Fixed Income and Multi-Asset capabilities. He has direct portfolio management responsibility for the Schroder Real Return Strategy, Schroder Balanced Strategy and Schroder Fixed Income Core-Plus Strategy

Expertise

equities inflation volatility cycle

Comments

Please sign in to comment on this wire.