Central banks running too fast or too slow?

Kerry Craig

J.P. Morgan Asset Management

Short dated bonds have aggressively repriced as inflation expectations rise and fears creep in that central bankers maybe heading towards a policy mistake as longer dated maturities are not rising as fast and yield curves flatten. So will a crash come from moving too fast or too slow?

The U.S. September Consumer Price Index (CPI) report indicating that inflation may be less “transitory” than the Federal Reserve (Fed) initially expected, and employment data points towards a tighter labor market, investors are starting to debate whether the Fed is falling too far behind the curve when it comes to hiking rates. Meanwhile, in the UK, the combination of firm overall growth, a strong labor market, and intense supply and price issues is putting pressure on the Bank of England (BoE) to raise rates sooner. The market expectation now is for the BoE to raise the official cash rate as early as their November meeting.

Will the Fed move too slow?

The debate on whether the Fed should bring their rate hike forward was sparked by recent U.S. economic data releases that suggest that the above-trend inflation we have been experiencing may linger for longer. Most notably, the CPI report showed that higher home prices are starting to filter into inflation, with owners’ equivalent rent increasing by 0.4% month-over-month, the largest increase since 2006. This is important not only because rent accounts for more than one-third of the CPI weighting, but also because it tends to be stickier and more inertial than other components such as food or energy. It is also important because there is a strong historical relationship between the unemployment rate and shelter inflation, with tighter labor markets tending to lead rising rental prices, suggesting that labor markets may be tighter than the employment report indicated.

However, it would be impossible to ignore the fact that most of the strength in inflation this year prior to the September release was focused on pandemic-related goods prices, rather than services. As the economy reopens and consumers start allocating more of their spending to services, the demand for goods may moderate. This demand transition, coupled with the eventual resolution of supply chain disruptions (see our previous paper “Are we entering a period of stagflation?”) should relieve some of the inflationary pressure we have been seeing in 1H2021, and this should help to bring headline inflation closer to the Fed’s 2% long-term target.

Before concluding that the Fed should tighten monetary policy sooner, it is important to note that tightening just to curb goods demand may be unwise given that demand may eventually subside and supply side dynamics may improve. It would be worth waiting until after the Fed starts the tapering process to observe whether the broadening of inflationary pressure we saw in the September data will still persist.

Will the BoE move too fast?

In the UK, curbing inflationary pressures is made even more difficult by the fact that the BoE targets headline inflation, which has been higher due to the surging energy prices. BoE governor Andrew Bailey warned that the central bank will “have to act” to curb inflationary forces and warned that higher energy costs will cause inflationary pressures to linger. He also noted that while monetary policy is not effective in countering supply disruptions, policymakers should avoid allowing higher inflationary pressures to become entrenched as it has so far this year. As the chart illustrates, the 5-year 5-year measure of inflation expectations has risen to its highest since 2010 in the UK. Governor Bailey’s comment is the latest in a series of attempts by BoE officials to lay the groundwork for a potential rate liftoff in November, which would make the BoE the first major developed market central bank to raise rates following the pandemic.

Investors are concerned that this tightening is premature, worrying that this will stall the recovery momentum. A key parallel drawn by these investors was the rate hike by the European Central Bank in 2011 following the global financial crisis (GFC) and during a raging debt crisis, where they had to cut them merely four months later. However, it is important to differentiate the current situation from that of 2011. While government austerity was a major factor behind the weakness in nominal activity after GFC, governments now appear to be more willing to turn to fiscal spending and have great ambitions to “build back better”. As such, it could be wise for the BoE to start tightening gradually to respond to evolving medium-term inflation risks.

Investment implications

As corporate profits usually rise along with prices, equities offer a hedge against moderately rising inflation. Though we are seeing nominal yields climb, real yields are still firmly in the negative territory given the higher inflation expectations. Deeply negative real rate should continue to support equities on equities on relative valuations. However, higher yields could put more pressure on those parts of the market which are highly valued as forward earnings are discounted at a higher rate.

A steepening of the yield curve as growth fears fade is positive for the more cyclical- and value-oriented parts of the equity market as they are historically positively correlated with yields and poised to benefit from the post-pandemic recovery.

Within fixed income, an active approach as yields are expected to continue rising. Investors can tackle the challenges from duration risk and rising yields by looking for fixed income assets with short duration, or low sensitivity to rising rates. High yield bonds and selective emerging market fixed income can also help generate return from their relatively high coupons.

........
For the purposes of MiFID II, the JPM Market Insights and Portfolio Insights programs are marketing communications and are not in scope for any MiFID II / MiFIR requirements specifically related to investment research. Furthermore, the J.P. Morgan Asset Management Market Insights and Portfolio Insights programs, as non-independent research, have not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, nor are they subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. This document is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be used as advice or a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purpose in any jurisdiction, nor is it a commitment from J.P. Morgan Asset Management or any of its subsidiaries to participate in any of the transactions mentioned herein. Any examples used are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision and it should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any securities or products. In addition, users should make an independent assessment of the legal, regulatory, tax, credit and accounting implications and determine, together with their own professional advisers, if any investment mentioned herein is believed to be suitable to their personal goals. Investors should ensure that they obtain all available relevant information before making any investment. Any forecasts, figures, opinions or investment techniques and strategies set out are for information purposes only, based on certain assumptions and current market conditions and are subject to change without prior notice. All information presented herein is considered to be accurate at the time of production, but no warranty of accuracy is given and no liability in respect of any error or omission is accepted. It should be noted that investment involves risks, the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and taxation agreements and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Both past performance and yields are not reliable indicators of current and future results. J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. To the extent permitted by applicable law, we may record telephone calls and monitor electronic communications to comply with our legal and regulatory obligations and internal policies. Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our Company’s Privacy Policy. For further information regarding our regional privacy policies please refer to the EMEA Privacy Policy; for locational Asia Pacific privacy policies, please click on the respective links: Hong Kong Privacy Policy, Australia Privacy Policy, Taiwan Privacy Policy, Japan

Kerry Craig
Global Market Strategist.
J.P. Morgan Asset Management

Kerry Craig, Executive Director, is a Global Market Strategist. Based in Melbourne, Kerry is responsible for communicating the latest market and economic views from our Global Market Insights Strategy Team.

I would like to

Only to be used for sending genuine email enquiries to the Contributor. Livewire Markets Pty Ltd reserves its right to take any legal or other appropriate action in relation to misuse of this service.

Personal Information Collection Statement
Your personal information will be passed to the Contributor and/or its authorised service provider to assist the Contributor to contact you about your investment enquiry. They are required not to use your information for any other purpose. Our privacy policy explains how we store personal information and how you may access, correct or complain about the handling of personal information.